How Do Multiple Cantilever Beams with Rigid Links Affect Load Distribution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DWSprings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams Cantilever
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of multiple cantilever beams connected by rigid links and how these connections affect load distribution and spring constants. Participants explore theoretical approaches to determine the total spring constant and load deviations across different sections of the beams.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using free-body diagrams and Castigliano's theorem to derive the total spring constant and load deviations.
  • Another participant raises the possibility that the rigid links may only transmit vertical loads, implying a different approach may be needed if the links are not truly rigid.
  • A later reply indicates that the configuration is a simplified model of a laminated parabolic leaf spring and expresses a desire to obtain theoretical results alongside previously performed finite element analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the rigid links and their implications for the analysis. There is no consensus on whether the links are truly rigid or if they behave more like pinned connections, leading to multiple competing perspectives on the problem.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about the behavior of the rigid links and the application of Castigliano's theorem are not universally agreed upon, which may affect the analysis. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the problem, suggesting that a finite element model might be more practical for certain interpretations.

DWSprings
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys! I need some help mutiple cantilever beams.
There are three cantilever beams. Single load is applied at the end of an above beam only.
Each beam has own spring constant(k1, k2, k3), thickness(t1,t2,t3) and same width, B. They are connected with blue rigid links like on figure.
they are just applied for connected condition of beams and transfer forces to the other beams. Then they can be ignored structurally.

1. How can get total spring constant?

2. How can get load deviationon each section of beams?
(ab, bc, de, ef, gh)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2160.jpg
    IMG_2160.jpg
    20.2 KB · Views: 502
Engineering news on Phys.org
You'll have to draw 3 separate free-body diagrams and use Castigliano's theorem (CT) a lot. To get the total spring constant, you'll have to assume the deflection is x at the end of the top beam (point C) and then use CT to get the deflection at point B. Then, if those really are rigid links, then the deflection at B is the same as at point F. Do CT again to get the deflection at F. Then assume the deflection at F is the same as at point H. Then, since you have the deflections of all the beam ends in terms of x, then the equation becomes F = k_1*d_c + k_2*d_f + k_3*d_h, where d_z is the deflection at point z. Rearrange to get the form F = k*x and then k becomes the total spring constant.

The deviation in the beams can be solved for by Castigliano's theorem. I'll leave you to figure that out.
 
If this is a textbook-type question, the "rigid links" are probably meant to transmit only loads in the vertical direction - i.e. they are actiully pinned to the beams, not rigidily connected. In that case, what timthereaper said.

If the links really are rigid, so the rotation of the beam at each end must be the same, and when a finite length of link rotates the ends also move horizontally (so the beams have axial tension and compression as well as bending), this is getting too tough for a sane person to want to solve it by hand. Making a finite element model would be much more practical.
 
Actually the attached figure is a simplified model of laminated parabolic leaf spring.
then i drew the rigid links just for expressing the contact points of spring.
the FEA was aleady preformed but i want to get results with the theoretical method too.
i will try to get the constant with Casigliano's theorem~
timthereaper, AlephZero, Thanks for your help! :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K