How Do Phase Shifts and Path Differences Affect Interference in Soap Films?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interference of light in a soap film, specifically focusing on the effects of phase shifts and path differences between reflected rays. Participants are analyzing the conditions for constructive and destructive interference based on the film's thickness and refractive index.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the phase shifts occurring at the interfaces of the soap film and the implications for path differences between reflected rays. There are attempts to verify specific statements regarding phase shifts and to determine the minimum thickness of the film for destructive interference.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided potential answers to the initial questions, while others are exploring the conditions for destructive interference. There is an ongoing examination of the relationships between the film's thickness, the wavelength of light, and the phase shifts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of different indices of refraction and the conditions under which constructive and destructive interference occur, including the number of phase reversals during reflection.

fubag
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Interference in Soap films

Homework Statement


The sketch View Figure shows a thin film of soapy water of uniform thickness t and index of refraction n = 1.33 suspended in air. Consider rays 1 and 2 emerging from the film: Ray 1 represents the reflected wave at the air-film interface and ray 2 represents the wave that reflects off the lower surface of the film.

Which of the following statements correctly describes rays 1 and 2 and their path difference?
Check all that apply.

a.Ray 1 undergoes a half-cycle phase shift. Ray 2 does not undergo any phase shift.
b.Both rays 1 and 2 undergo a half-cycle phase shift.
c.Ray 2 undergoes a half-cycle phase shift. Ray 1 does not undergo any phase shift.
d.The path difference between rays 1 and 2 is about t.
e.There is no path difference between the two rays.
f.The path difference between rays 1 and 2 is about 2t.

http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1020409/16/1020409.jpg

Homework Equations



2nd = (m + 0.5) (lambda)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know there is a 180 degree phase change at the first interface and no change at the second. Using my physics textbook it says with thickness d, for case of normal incidence, extra length is 2d.

I am still confused at what parts are true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think the answers are b, and f

could someone please verify?
 
ok i solved the first part, but having difficulty with the 2nd part.

When red light is directed normal to the surface of the soap film, the soap film appears black in reflected light. What is thinnest the film can be?

Let lambda_0 be the wavelength of red light in air.

a. {lambda_0}/{2}
b. 3{lambda_0}/{5.32}
c. {lambda_0}/{2.66}
d. {lambda_0}/{1.33}
e. {lambda_0}/{4}

Ok so I know we have to find destructive interference which occurs according to 2nd = (m+ 0.5) lambda. So I have to solve for the wavelength of red light in this situation and then find the appropriate thickness it can be. I am having trouble with this one actually.
 
just a hunch but I thought about plugging in some numbers given in the problem:

2(1.33)d = (m + 0.5)(lamda)

d = ((m + 0.5)lamda)/(2.66)

if we move the 0.5 down, and assign m = 3 I get choice B = (3*lambda)/(5.32)

does this logic make sense? it seems to fit the equation?
 
fubag said:
ok i solved the first part, but having difficulty with the 2nd part.

When red light is directed normal to the surface of the soap film, the soap film appears black in reflected light. What is thinnest the film can be?

Let lambda_0 be the wavelength of red light in air.

a. {lambda_0}/{2}
b. 3{lambda_0}/{5.32}
c. {lambda_0}/{2.66}
d. {lambda_0}/{1.33}
e. {lambda_0}/{4}

Ok so I know we have to find destructive interference which occurs according to 2nd = (m+ 0.5) lambda.

The condition for this case will be

<br /> 2 n d = m \lambda_0<br />
 
ok so using that... the thinnest it can be is when m = 1, and therefore

d = (lambda) / (2.66) ?
 
That looks right to me; does it make sense?
 
just curious then, the formula for constructive interference in a thin film is given by:
2nd = (m+0.5)lambda

and the destructive interference in a thin film is then given by:
2nd = m(lambda)

?
 
fubag said:
just curious then, the formula for constructive interference in a thin film is given by:
2nd = (m+0.5)lambda

and the destructive interference in a thin film is then given by:
2nd = m(lambda)

?

It depends on the number of phase reversals that take place due to reflection. (When light reflects from a material with a higher n than it has it undergoes a phase reversal, or a 180 degree phase shift.)

If there is one phase reversal, as there is here, then 2nd=m(lambda) is the destructive condition. If there is zero or two phase reversals, then 2nd=m(lambda) is the constructive condition.

(An example of two reversals would be a soap film on glass; the layers (air/soap/glass) would have indices (1/1.3/1.5). So the light that reflects off the soap undergoes a phase reversal, and the light that reflects off the glass also has a phase reversal.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
903
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
869
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K