How Do Raising Operators Work in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Quantum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of raising and lowering operators in quantum mechanics, specifically the operators \(\hat{a}\) and \(\hat{a}^\dagger\). The equation \(\hat{a} \hat{a} = \left(\frac{\hat{H}}{\hbar \omega}\right) - \frac{1}{2}\) is analyzed, leading to the expression \(\langle n|\hat{a} \hat{a}|n\rangle = n \langle n|n\rangle\). The participant suggests using the relation \(\hat{a}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle\) to derive the necessary constants, confirming that this approach is valid for evaluating the operators' effects on quantum states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the role of operators.
  • Familiarity with the notation and properties of raising (\(\hat{a}^\dagger\)) and lowering (\(\hat{a}\)) operators.
  • Knowledge of the Hamiltonian operator (\(\hat{H}\)) and its relation to energy levels.
  • Basic grasp of bra-ket notation and inner products in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the harmonic oscillator's energy eigenstates in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of the commutation relations for quantum operators.
  • Explore the significance of the vacuum state in quantum field theory.
  • Investigate the application of ladder operators in solving quantum mechanical problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of operator algebra in quantum systems.

Chronos000
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I don't understand the following step:

using [tex]\hat{}a*[/tex][tex]\hat{}a[/tex] = ([tex]\hat{}H[/tex]/[tex]\hbar[/tex]w ) -1/2

<n|[tex]\hat{}a*[/tex][tex]\hat{}a[/tex]|n> = n<n|n>.

my first thoughts were to use a|n> = sqrt n | n-1> but I don't think that's relevant

if you sub in a*a and separate it into two expressions I don't see what good that would do
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Chronos000 said:
I don't understand the following step:

using [tex]\hat{}a*[/tex][tex]\hat{}a[/tex] = ([tex]\hat{}H[/tex]/[tex]\hbar[/tex]w ) -1/2

<n|[tex]\hat{}a*[/tex][tex]\hat{}a[/tex]|n> = n<n|n>.

my first thoughts were to use a|n> = sqrt n | n-1> but I don't think that's relevant

if you sub in a*a and separate it into two expressions I don't see what good that would do

You can indeed obtain [tex]\langle n|\hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} |n\rangle[/tex] by using your formula for [tex]\hat{a} |n\rangle[/tex] as well as the corresponding formula for [tex]\hat{a}^\dagger |n-1\rangle[/tex].
 
I shouldn't actually have mentioned that, as my notes use a|n> initially to get a constant out. But then they provide the above step in order to obtain the value of that constant which turns out to be sqrt n
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K