Bosonic operator eigenvalues in second quantization

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
RicardoMP
Messages
48
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Following from [tex]\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j(\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )=(|B_-^j|^2-1)\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle[/tex], I want to prove that if I keep applying ##\hat{b}_j##, ## n_j##times, I'll get: [tex](|B_-^j|^2-n_j)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j ...<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle[/tex].

Homework Equations


Commutation relations: [tex][\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j,\hat{b}_j]=-\hat{b}_j[/tex]
Also: [tex] \langle \psi \mid<br /> \hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> =||\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> ||^2[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


After proving for n=1, I went for n=2 and from there on the proof would be trivial. However, for n=2 I get:
[tex]\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j(\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )=(|B_-^j|^2-1)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle[/tex] after using the commutation relation I referred above (the same for n>2). How do I get [tex](|B_-^j|^2-2)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle[/tex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RicardoMP said:

Homework Statement


Following from [tex]\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j(\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )=(|B_-^j|^2-1)\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle[/tex], I want to prove that if I keep applying ##\hat{b}_j##, ## n_j##times, I'll get: [tex](|B_-^j|^2-n_j)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j ...<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle[/tex].

Homework Equations


Commutation relations: [tex][\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j,\hat{b}_j]=-\hat{b}_j[/tex]
Also: [tex] \langle \psi \mid<br /> \hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> =||\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> ||^2[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


After proving for n=1, I went for n=2 and from there on the proof would be trivial. However, for n=2 I get:
[tex]\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j(\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )=(|B_-^j|^2-1)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle[/tex] after using the commutation relation I referred above (the same for n>2). How do I get [tex](|B_-^j|^2-2)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle[/tex]?
If the question is really that you must keep applying ##\hat{b}_j##, then it means that it must be applied from the left. For n=2 you should be doing
[tex]\hat{b}_j \hat{b}^\dagger_j(\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )[/tex]