Bosonic operator eigenvalues in second quantization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the eigenvalue relationship in second quantization using bosonic operators, specifically the operator \(\hat{b}_j\). The key equation established is \(\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j(\hat{b}_j \mid \Psi \rangle) = (|B_-^j|^2 - 1)\hat{b}_j \mid \Psi \rangle\). The participant seeks to extend this proof to show that applying \(\hat{b}_j\) \(n_j\) times results in \((|B_-^j|^2 - n_j)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j\ldots \mid \Psi \rangle\). The commutation relation \([\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j, \hat{b}_j] = -\hat{b}_j\) is crucial for deriving the results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bosonic operators and second quantization
  • Familiarity with commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of eigenvalue problems in quantum systems
  • Experience with linear algebra concepts relevant to quantum states
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the commutation relation \([\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j, \hat{b}_j]\) in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the derivation of eigenvalues in second quantization frameworks
  • Investigate the role of bosonic operators in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the mathematical techniques for manipulating quantum states and operators
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for quantum physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers focusing on quantum field theory and many-body physics.

RicardoMP
Messages
48
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Following from \hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j(\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )=(|B_-^j|^2-1)\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br />, I want to prove that if I keep applying ##\hat{b}_j##, ## n_j##times, I'll get: (|B_-^j|^2-n_j)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j ...<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br />.

Homework Equations


Commutation relations: [\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j,\hat{b}_j]=-\hat{b}_j
Also: <br /> \langle \psi \mid<br /> \hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> =||\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> ||^2

The Attempt at a Solution


After proving for n=1, I went for n=2 and from there on the proof would be trivial. However, for n=2 I get:
\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j(\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )=(|B_-^j|^2-1)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> after using the commutation relation I referred above (the same for n>2). How do I get (|B_-^j|^2-2)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br />?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RicardoMP said:

Homework Statement


Following from \hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j(\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )=(|B_-^j|^2-1)\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br />, I want to prove that if I keep applying ##\hat{b}_j##, ## n_j##times, I'll get: (|B_-^j|^2-n_j)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j ...<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br />.

Homework Equations


Commutation relations: [\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j,\hat{b}_j]=-\hat{b}_j
Also: <br /> \langle \psi \mid<br /> \hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> =||\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> ||^2

The Attempt at a Solution


After proving for n=1, I went for n=2 and from there on the proof would be trivial. However, for n=2 I get:
\hat{b}^\dagger_j\hat{b}_j(\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )=(|B_-^j|^2-1)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> after using the commutation relation I referred above (the same for n>2). How do I get (|B_-^j|^2-2)\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br />?
If the question is really that you must keep applying ##\hat{b}_j##, then it means that it must be applied from the left. For n=2 you should be doing
\hat{b}_j \hat{b}^\dagger_j(\hat{b}_j\hat{b}_j<br /> \mid \Psi \rangle<br /> )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K