How Do Symmetries Determine Expectation Values in Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a Hamiltonian with specific symmetry properties. The original poster attempts to find the expectation values of the position components in the ground state by leveraging the symmetries of the Hamiltonian.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of a parity operator and its implications for the Hamiltonian's symmetries. There is exploration of how the invariance under cyclic permutations affects the expectation values of the position components.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the implications of the Hamiltonian's symmetries, suggesting that the expectation values of the position components may be equal. However, there is no explicit consensus on the final values or methods to calculate them.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the definition of the parity operator used by the original poster, as well as the assumption that the Hamiltonian's symmetry can be leveraged to determine expectation values without additional calculations.

eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
[QM] Hamiltonian and symmetries

Homework Statement


Let there be the hamiltonian:
[tex]H=\frac{P^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2(x^2+y^2+z^2)+kxyz+\frac{k^2}{\hbar \omega}x^2y^2z^2[/tex]
Find the expectation value of the three components of [tex]\vec r[/tex] in the ground state using ONLY the symmetry properties of the hamiltonian.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I define this parity:
[tex]\Pi_{xy}: x\rightarrow-x\ \ \ \ y\rightarrow-y[/tex]
Then the hamiltonian commutes with this parity: [tex][H, \Pi_{xy}]=0[/tex]
The ground state is not degenerate, so it has a definite parity with respect to [tex]\Pi_{xy}[/tex]:
[tex]<gs|x|gs>=<gs|\Pi_{xy}\Pi_{xy}x\Pi_{xy}\Pi_{xy}|gs>=-<gs|\Pi_{xy}x\Pi_{xy}|gs>=-<gs|x|gs>[/tex]
So <gs|x|gs>=0;
Is it right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


eoghan said:
I define this parity:
[tex]\Pi_{xy}: x\rightarrow-x\ \ \ \ y\rightarrow-y[/tex]
That is not the definition of the parity operator I am familiar with. What happened to
[tex]z\rightarrow-z?[/tex]
Then the hamiltonian commutes with this parity: [tex][H, \Pi_{xy}]=0[/tex]
Only because you defined "this parity" so that it commutes.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I know this is not the usual parity... but I don't really know any other way to solve this problem
 
As I mentioned earlier, your Hamiltonian is invariant under cyclic permutations. In other words, the system cannot distinguish x from y from z (it doesn't know the alphabet). What do you think that implies about the expectation values <x>, <y> and <z>?
 
kuruman said:
As I mentioned earlier, your Hamiltonian is invariant under cyclic permutations. In other words, the system cannot distinguish x from y from z (it doesn't know the alphabet). What do you think that implies about the expectation values <x>, <y> and <z>?
That they are all the same?
 
eoghan said:
That they are all the same?
Correct. Since they are all the same, calculating one of them will give you the others. So what do you think that value can be and why?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K