How do the Setter dog breeds relate to the Predatory Sequence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter symbolipoint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
AI Thread Summary
Setter dog breeds, such as the Gordon and Irish Setters, exhibit specific traits related to the Predatory Sequence, primarily in their abilities to search and observe, while showing less proficiency in other aspects like biting and killing. This selective breeding likely aimed to enhance desirable traits aligned with the Predatory Sequence while minimizing less favorable behaviors. Historically, breeding decisions may have been based on perceived utility rather than a detailed understanding of behavioral sequences. Advances in genetic mapping now allow for more sophisticated breeding practices, enabling the identification of genetic traits linked to both health issues and desirable behaviors. This genetic manipulation accelerates the development of new dog strains with targeted characteristics, paralleling techniques used in agriculture and aquaculture. Understanding the Predatory Sequence, which includes steps like orienting and stalking, provides insight into the behavioral patterns of these breeds and their evolutionary adaptations.
symbolipoint
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,545
Reaction score
1,994
TL;DR Summary
How do the Setter dog breeds relate to the Predatory Sequence?
Maybe this is not a well made question, but how or in what ways are the Setter dog breeds related to the Predatory Sequence? What parts of the sequence are expressed and what parts are inhibited?

Interested readers who might not be much aware of the Predatory Sequence can do some simple information search to find out what the parts of this sequence are. My guess only goes as far as reckoning that such breeds as Gordon Setter and Irish Setter are good at searching and observing, but are weaker at much the rest of the Predatory Sequence.

On the other hand, such breeds as Terriers are good at biting, ripping, and killing. I might guess that selective breeding of the Setters was done in order to attempt to keep next generations more in line with the parts of the sequence that the breeders wanted while avoiding making those "next generations" from showing the parts of the sequence that the breeders did not want in them.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I have heard of this before as a behavior sequence (not uncommon in the study of animal behavior) as being broken in different places in this naturally occurring patterns of different behavioral actions (common in analyzing animal behavior). Its an interesting thing that I don't know many details on.

A complex behavioral sequence (like a predatory sequence) would be driven by evolved structure/functions in the nervous system (brain).
Such structure/functions would be constructed in the animals early in their lifetime by genetically encoded developmental processes.
It could therefore be broken in different ways by changes in genetics (mutations).
This has been done in behavioral mutations in model research organisms like, worms (C. elegans), flies (Drosophila), fish (zebrafish), and mammals (mice). Dogs, cats, race horses, etc. should work the same way.
Breeding provides a way to manipulate the genetics and direct changes.

symbolipoint said:
Summary: How do the Setter dog breeds relate to the Predatory Sequence?

I might guess that selective breeding of the Setters was done in order to attempt to keep next generations more in line with the parts of the sequence that the breeders wanted while avoiding making those "next generations" from showing the parts of the sequence that the breeders did not want in them.
I think that in the deep past when many of the older breeds were being established, they were probably selected by people for breeding based on their perception of being useful, rather than considering parts of a behavioral sequence.
Things probably become more complex over time.

Currently, possible ways to breed things can be quite sophisticated.
The dog genome has been mapped (molecularly) and many comparisons have been made between different types of dogs. This identifies genetic areas or genes that effect particular traits.
I am sure that in some cases molecular genetic loci have been identified in dogs for both problems (health issues, especially in inbred lines) and useful traits.
This makes it possible to identify carriers of genes and either direct their breeding or screen through offspring for genetic carriers.
This in turn really speeds up the rate at which new strains with new properties can be generated.
This approach applies to dogs, and is also used in agriculture, aquaculture, and plant genetics.

https://positively.com/dog-behavior/aggression/predatory-behavior/ comes this:
The full predatory sequence is:

  1. Eye
  2. Orient
  3. Stalk
  4. Chase
  5. Grab/bite
  6. Kill/bite
  7. Dissect
  8. Consum
I guess smell might have included in the first step.

Orienting (#2) toward a stimulus is a really basic feature of animal behavior.
This is very rough but common view of how this would work:
Sensory inputs come into the brain, go to a spatial map of the animals surrounding area (in the optic tectum in lower vertebrates, which then drives movements to orient the (and distance sensory gear) toward whatever the disturbance is located. (You hear a sudden sound and you will reflexively turn your head toward it to gain mor information on what's going on over there.)
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970 and symbolipoint
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top