Graduate How do we derive the number of string excitation modes for large N?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the number of open string excitation modes as presented in Becker, Becker, Schwarz, specifically referencing equation 2.148. The original poster struggles to reproduce this equation from a Taylor expansion of equation 2.145 and notes that setting w close to 1 does not yield the expected results. They also mention difficulties in analyzing equation 2.146 around zero. A suggestion is made to apply the residue theorem to equation 2.144, highlighting that w=1 is an isolated essential singularity. The conversation seeks insights or tricks to successfully derive equation 2.148.
Eugene Chen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
On page 52 in Becker, Becker, Schwarz, there is an equation (2.148) for the number of open string excitation modes.
I tried to Tayler expand eq 2.145, but couldn't reproduce 2.148. Plus, one gets 2.145 by setting w close to 1; even if I use the 2.146 and try to analyze it around 0, I am still very far from getting 2.148
Does anyone know any trick to do this?
309674106_809953983537296_1863235808189370018_n.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like one applies the residue theorem to 2.144 using right hand expression in 2.145. ##\omega=1## is an isolated essential singularity of this expression.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K