How is Euler's Identity proven using differential equations?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ILoveParticlePhysics
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Euler's Identity, expressed as eπi = -1, is proven using differential equations by demonstrating that the functions f(x) = eix and g(x) = cos(x) + i sin(x) satisfy the same differential equation, f'(x) = i f(x), and share the same initial condition, f(0) = g(0) = 1. This proof utilizes the power series expansion of the exponential function and the uniqueness of solutions as stated in Picard's theorem. Evaluating f(π) and g(π) confirms Euler's Identity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with differential equations and their solutions
  • Knowledge of power series and Taylor series expansions
  • Basic concepts of trigonometric functions and their relationships with complex exponentials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the power series for ex and its applications
  • Learn about Picard's theorem and its implications in differential equations
  • Explore the relationship between complex exponentials and trigonometric functions
  • Investigate further applications of Euler's Identity in engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in complex analysis and differential equations will benefit from this discussion, particularly those looking to deepen their understanding of Euler's Identity and its proof.

ILoveParticlePhysics
Messages
9
Reaction score
4
How do we know that e^πi= -1 if all numbers here are basically undefined/irrational?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, I'm not irrational! :smile: Anyway, start from$$e^{iz} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{i^k z^k}{k!} $$and split this sum into odd and even terms. See if you can get it in terms of sines and coses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and PeroK
ILoveParticlePhysics said:
How do we know that e^πi= -1 if all numbers here are basically undefined/irrational?
Generalisations of the exponential function can usually be defined via the power series method above. That's how we can also define the exponential of a matrix.
 
In case you are more familiar with differential equations, there's a proof of the fact that ##e^{ix}=\cos{x}+i\sin{x}## that it's really nice. If we define
$$f(x)=e^{ix}, \qquad g(x)=\cos{x}+i\sin{x}$$
It is really easy to see that both satisfy the differential equation
$$f'(x) = i f(x), \qquad g'(x) = i g(x)$$
Furthermore, both satisfy the initial condition
$$f(0)=g(0)=1$$
Because ##f(0)=e^{0}=1##.
Then, since these two functions satisfy the same differential equation with the same initial condition, by the uniqueness of the solutions (Picard's theorem) they must be the same function. QED

Then just evaluate ##f(\pi)=g(\pi)## to obtain Euler's identity.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude, mfb and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
626
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
11K