B How do we know what would happen if time reversed?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter olamosey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Time reversal
AI Thread Summary
Sean Carroll's lectures highlight the CPLEAR experiment, which indicates that weak interactions differ when time is reversed. However, the assumption that reversing a particle interaction equates to actual time reversal is questioned. There is uncertainty about whether kaons would convert to anti-kaons at the same rate if time were truly reversed. The discussion emphasizes that this assumption lacks empirical support, as it presumes no other changes occur during the reversal. Ultimately, the complexities of time reversal in physics remain unresolved.
olamosey
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
The weak interactions are different going forward and going backwards in time. But how can we know this, since we can’t actually reverse time?
In Sean Carroll's lectures Mysteries of Modern Physics: Time, he talks about the the CPLEAR experiment, which showed that the weak interactions are different going forward and going backwards in time. But it seems like there is a big assumption: reversing a particle interaction means that it is happening backwards in time. But it isn't, no time reversal is actually happening. How do we know that if we could actually reverse time, we would see kaons turning into anti-kaons at the same rate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
olamosey said:
How do we know that if we could actually reverse time, we would see kaons turning into anti-kaons at the same rate?
We don't. You are correct in that there is an assumption that nothing else changes when we 'reverse' time.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top