How Do You Calculate Object-to-Image Distance in Lens Systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aelo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the object-to-image distance in a lens system involving a thin lens with a specified focal length. The problem includes dimensions of an object and a detector, prompting participants to explore the relationship between these elements and the lens formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the lens formula and the relationship between object distance (l), image distance (l'), and focal length (F). There is exploration of the magnification concept, with questions about how to apply the dimensions of the object and image in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the magnification and its implications for the distances involved. There is ongoing clarification regarding the signs of the distances and the interpretation of dimensions as they relate to the lens system.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the dimensions provided for the object and detector, questioning how these relate to the calculations needed for the problem. There is a focus on understanding the signs associated with distances in the context of real and inverted images.

Aelo
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 50 mm focal length thin lens in air is used to image a 250 mm x 250 mm object onto a 10 mm x 10 mm detector. What is the overall object-to-image distance (throw)? Besides the exact solution, can you think of a reasonable approximation?


Homework Equations


Throw, T = l' - l
For a thin lens: (1/l') = (1/F) + (1/l)
For a thin lens in air: f = -F

The Attempt at a Solution



Since f = 50 mm was given, F = -50 mm. I'm thinking that if I could find either l' or l, I could then use the second equation to find the remaining unknown, and then plug into the equation for T. I'm not sure how to use the given dimensions for the object and detector. I know of no equations that incorporate the area, and I can't determine what else they could be used to describe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aelo said:

Homework Statement


A 50 mm focal length thin lens in air is used to image a 250 mm x 250 mm object onto a 10 mm x 10 mm detector. What is the overall object-to-image distance (throw)? Besides the exact solution, can you think of a reasonable approximation?


Homework Equations


Throw, T = l' - l
For a thin lens: (1/l') = (1/F) + (1/l)
For a thin lens in air: f = -F

The Attempt at a Solution



Since f = 50 mm was given, F = -50 mm. I'm thinking that if I could find either l' or l, I could then use the second equation to find the remaining unknown, and then plug into the equation for T. I'm not sure how to use the given dimensions for the object and detector. I know of no equations that incorporate the area, and I can't determine what else they could be used to describe.

You get the magnification from the given sizes of object and image. The image is on the detector, so it is real. How are l and l' related ?

ehild
 
M = l' / l

Is it correct to think that the lateral magnification is the ratio between the horizontal length of the image and that of the object? If so, then M = 10 mm / 250 mm = .04

l' = l*M so 1/F = 1/(l*M) - 1/l = 1/(l*M) - M/(l*M) = (1 - M)/(l*M)
=> l = F*(1 - M)/M
 
Aelo said:
M = l' / l

Is it correct to think that the lateral magnification is the ratio between the horizontal length of the image and that of the object? If so, then M = 10 mm / 250 mm = .04

take care of the sign of M.

ehild
 
Why would either 10 mm or 250 mm be negative? I understand l would be negative since it is measured from the lens to the object, so I agree that M should be negative, but I didn't think the dimensions of the object and image were given relative to anything. Is taking the ratio between horizontal lengths "one of those" formulas where I calculate the magnitude and have to come up with the sign independently?
 
We take the real image inverted, so its height negative.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Oh, it's the ratio of heights, not widths. Thank you very much for your help. :)
 
Aelo said:
Oh, it's the ratio of heights, not widths. Thank you very much for your help. :)

You are welcome. :smile:

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K