How Do You Calculate the Actual Diameter of a Red Blood Cell Using a Microscope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter katierob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Microscope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the actual diameter of a red blood cell using a microscope with specific parameters: an objective lens focal length of 16.22 mm, an eyepiece focal length of 9.30 mm, and a barrel length of 25.0 cm. The image subtends an angle of 1.43 mrad at the eye, leading to the use of the magnification formula m = -L/Fo(25cm/Fe) and the relationship between image height and object height. The calculations presented reveal a discrepancy in the final object height, indicating potential errors in the conversion of units or the application of the magnification formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical physics, specifically lens systems.
  • Familiarity with magnification calculations in microscopy.
  • Knowledge of angular measurements and their application in optics.
  • Proficiency in unit conversions, particularly between millimeters and meters.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of lens magnification in optical systems.
  • Study the relationship between angular measurements and physical dimensions in microscopy.
  • Learn about the calculation of object height from image height using magnification.
  • Explore common pitfalls in unit conversions in physics calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or biology, microscopy technicians, and anyone involved in optical measurements and calculations.

katierob
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A microscope has an objective lens with a focal length of 16.22 mm and an eyepiece with a focal length of 9.30 mm. With the length of the barrel set at 25.0 cm, the diameter of a red blood cell's image subtends an angle of 1.43 mrad with the eye. If the final image distance is 25.0 cm from the eyepiece, what is the actual diameter of the red blood cell?
h1 =

Homework Equations


m=-L/Fo(25cm/Fe)
m=hi/ho

The Attempt at a Solution


I can't figure out how to get the object height without the image height? I think it has something to do with the angle at which the image subtends with the eye, but I don't have an equation for that, so I don't know where to go once I get m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For small angles, the angle is the ratio of the height of the image to its distance from the eye. This comes from the definition of an angle (in radians) as the ratio of arc length to radius. If you know how far the image is from the eye, you can calculate its height from the angle.
 
thanks, so I tried this again using the ratio you gave above, but it still isn't coming out right, here's what I did:
m=-(25/1.622)(25/.93)=-414.3298463
height of the image=(1.43e-3)(25cm)=.03575
height of the object=(.03575) / (-414.3298463) = -.86283912e-6 meters
why is this incorrect?
 
katierob said:
thanks, so I tried this again using the ratio you gave above, but it still isn't coming out right, here's what I did:
m=-(25/1.622)(25/.93)=-414.3298463
height of the image=(1.43e-3)(25cm)=.03575
height of the object=(.03575) / (-414.3298463) = -.86283912e-6 meters
why is this incorrect?

check your e-6
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K