How Do You Calculate the Average Force on a Driver in a Crash?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jayberd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Wall
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a race car that slows down to 90 km/h before crashing into a brick wall, with a focus on estimating the average force exerted on the driver by the safety harness during the crash. The discussion centers around concepts in dynamics and kinematics, particularly the relationship between force, mass, acceleration, and work-energy principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using kinematic equations to find acceleration and average force, with some questioning the assumptions made about initial velocity and stopping time. There is also mention of calculating total work done on the driver and relating it to average force and distance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to approach the problem. Some have suggested focusing on the work-energy principle to find the average force, while others are clarifying the conditions and variables involved in the calculations. There is no explicit consensus yet, as multiple interpretations and methods are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that there is insufficient information regarding the variation of force applied by the safety harness during the stopping motion. Reasonable estimates for the mass of the driver and stopping distance are also mentioned, indicating potential constraints in the problem setup.

jayberd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Problem:
A race car skidding out of control manages to slow down to 90km/h before crashing head-on into a brick wall. Fortunately, the driver is wearing a safety harness. Using reasonable values for the mass of the driver and the stopping distance, estimate the average force exerted on the driver by the safety harness, including its direction. Neglect any effects of frictional forces on the driver by the seat.

Equations:
F=ma this is net force, but what is average force?
vx=vox+axt


I tried using the vx equation to find the acceleration. I guessed the initial velocity of the car/driver was 130km/h and I also guessed it would take 5 seconds to bring the velocity down to 90km/h. I ended up getting a really tiny force no matter how I tried it. I also just tried finding the acceleration the normal way, but the same thing. Anyone else have a good way of going about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF jayberd!

The idea with the average force is that the safety harness applies a force to the driver over some distance (i.e. it allows him to move forward somewhat before stopping). In general, that force might vary over that distance in a complicated way (it won't be constant). We don't have enough information to say how the force that the safety harness applies varies with position during this stopping motion. All we can speak of is some sort of average force, where the average is taken over the distance interval.

The good news is that the total work done on the driver (which we DO know because we know his initial and final kinetic energies) will still be equal to that distance-averaged force times the total distance. So you don't have to actually take the average (which is good, because again, you don't have enough information to do so). Based on the total work done, you can work out what the average force had to have been.

We're talking about the deceleration that occurs from the moment of hitting the wall to the moment of the driver coming to a full stop. So 90 km/h is the INITIAL condition here, not the final one. The final condition is that the driver is at rest.
 
Last edited:
cepheid said:
Welcome to PF jayberd!

The idea with the average force is that the safety harness applies a force to the driver over some distance (i.e. it allows him to move forward somewhat before stopping). In general, that force might vary over that distance in a complicated way (it won't be constant). We don't have enough information to say how the force that the safety harness applies varies with position during this stopping motion. All we can speak of is some sort of average force, where the average is taken over the distance interval.

The good news is that the total work done on the driver (which we DO know because we know his initial and final kinetic energies) will still be equal to that distance-averaged force times the total distance. So you don't have to actually take the average (which is good, because again, you don't have enough information to do so). Based on the total work done, you can work out what the average force had to have been.

We're talking about the deceleration that occurs from the moment of hitting the wall to the moment of the driver coming to a full stop. So 90 km/h is the INITIAL condition here, not the final one. The final condition is that the driver is at rest.

so I end up having to solve for
0km/hr=90km/hr+axt
but where does t come from? s=dt? or can I use displacement in terms of velocity?
 
jayberd said:
so I end up having to solve for
0km/hr=90km/hr+axt
but where does t come from? s=dt? or can I use displacement in terms of velocity?

Umm, did you read my post? I think the best way of solving this problem is just to compute the total work done on the driver and equate it to the (average force)*(distance).
 
Last edited:
Or you could use the kinematic formula for velocity in terms of displacement, the only difference from usual being that a is interpreted as being the average acceleration (with the average being as I described before).
 
I suspect they're asking for the force exerted on the driver as he slows from 90km/h to 0km/h as the car crashes into the wall, crumpling up the front end of the car.

"... Using reasonable values for the mass of the driver and the stopping distance, estimate the average force exerted on the driver by the safety harness ..."

Reasonable mass & stopping distance might be ~75kg and ~1m respectively, both ± 30% or so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K