How Do You Compute the Electric Potential Using the Method of Image Charges?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the method of image charges in electrostatics, specifically involving two semi-infinite grounded conducting planes and a point charge located between them. Participants are exploring how to compute the electric potential and charge density in this configuration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine the positions and magnitudes of image charges needed to satisfy boundary conditions. They express uncertainty about their approach and seek validation of their reasoning. Other participants provide feedback on the original poster's calculations and suggest checking for symmetry in the setup.

Discussion Status

Some participants have affirmed the original poster's approach, while others have raised concerns about the symmetry of the charge distribution and potential errors in the expressions derived. The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the assumptions made and exploring the implications of the results.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring that the derived expressions meet the boundary conditions of the problem, and participants are considering the implications of their findings on the physical interpretation of the charge distributions on the planes.

BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19
Hi,

I am learning about the method of image charges, but am struggling to sufficiently justify my answer. It appears to be correct, though it quite possibly isn't...

1. Homework Statement

(please see attached item)

Two semi-infinite grounded conducting planes (the shaded region in the figure, corresponding to ##x ≤ 0## or ##y ≤ 0)## meet at right angles. In the region between them (i.e. ##x > 0## and ##y > 0##), there is a point charge, at a distance ##d## from each plane, as indicated in the figure. Set the z axis such that the charge q is at ##z = 0##.

(a) To compute the potential between the planes you need three image charges. What is their magnitude and where should they be located?

(b) Compute the electric potential between the planes.

(c) Compute the electric charge density σ on the planes.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
My answer to part (a) is essentially a guess, based on creating a symmetrical situation. I don't know how to justify it properly, and would love some help regarding this.

I have said that I need 2 charges of -q and one of charge +q.

-q (-d, d)
-q (d, -d)
+q (-d, -d)

Are the coordinates that I think they should be placed at.

I then look at the potential, and see that ##V(x,y) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} [\frac{q}{\sqrt{(x-d)^{2} + (y-d)^{2}}} - \frac{q}{\sqrt{(x+d)^{2} + (y-d)^{2}}} - \frac{q}{\sqrt{(x-d)^{2} + (y+d)^{2}}} + \frac{q}{\sqrt{(x+d)^{2} + (y+d)^{2}}}]##

which satisfies the conditions that at ##V(0,y) = 0## and ##V(x,0) = 0##

Am I on the right track here?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me !
 
BvU said:
Looks good to me !

That is good to hear! I do feel like I have cheated somewhat though. Is there a rigorous method to go about this, or is a guess generally acceptable provided it can be shown to satisfy the conditions?

For part (c) I need to find the charge distributions on each plane. I have done that in the same way I would for a single plane, and the expressions look like they make physical sense to me.

##\sigma_{x} = - \epsilon_{0} \frac{\partial V}{\partial y}|_{y = 0} = - \frac{q}{2 \pi} [\frac{d}{((x - d)^{2} + d^{2})^{3/2}} - \frac{d}{((x + d)^{2} + d^{2})^{3/2}} ]##

and ##\sigma_{y} = - \epsilon_{0} \frac{\partial V}{\partial x}|_{x = 0} = - \frac{q}{2 \pi} [\frac{d}{((y - d)^{2} + d^{2})^{3/2}} - \frac{d}{((y + d)^{2} + d^{2})^{3/2}} ]##

I think this makes sense because as the charge distribution would not be constant along the planes
 
Last edited:
Doesn't look symmetric around y = x !?
try x = d and you'll see the error
[edit] yes the ##(x-d)^2 -d^2## should have been ##(x-d)^2+d^2##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BOAS
BvU said:
Doesn't look symmetric around y = x !?
try x = d and you'll see the error

Sorry, what doesn't look symmetric around y = x?

Edit - Fixed a typo in my ##\sigma_{x}## expression
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K