How Do You Convert Between Parametric and Rectangular Equations?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around converting between parametric and rectangular equations, specifically addressing a problem involving the equations x = e^(-t) + 1 and y = e^(-2t) - 3. The user initially attempts to eliminate the parameter and derive the rectangular equation but is uncertain about their final result, y = x - 4, due to a substitution error. Additionally, they seek guidance on finding parametric equations for the rectangular equation (x - 2)² + y² = 9, realizing they need to consider both positive and negative square roots when solving for y. The conversation highlights common challenges in understanding these conversions and the importance of careful substitution and consideration of all solutions. Overall, the user expresses a need for clarification and support as they prepare for their exam.
LongTermStudent
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have an upcoming exam, and I'm having trouble grasping some concepts. The things that are currently perplexing me are parametric equations and rectangular equations and converting between the two. I have a problem like this

Given the parametric equations x = e^(-t) + 1 and y = e^(-2t) - 3, find the corresponding rectangular equation and sketch the curve of orientation.

To eliminate the parameter, I set the x equation equal to t as such:
t = -ln(x-1)

and then substituted this value into the y equation to get:
y = e^[ln(x - 1)] - 3
and got y = x - 4 as my final equation, but I'm not so confident in this answer.

Then I'm told to find a set of parametric equatiions for the rectangular equation (x - 2)² + y² = 9

I set x equal to t and soved for y and ended up with
y = sqrt(t²-4t+13)

This seems like only half the answer to me, but I barely know where to start, let alone how to continue. I'm sure I'll be kicking myself when I finally figure these concepts out, but I can't for the life of me wrap my head around any of it, and I have no access to a tutor between now and my exam. Any help/guidance is appreciated.

Edit: I see now I may have posted this in the wrong forum. My bad.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
for the first one, your substitution was wrong, you should get e^(-2t) = e^(-2(-ln(x-1))) which doesn't go down to just (x-1)

for the second one I think you get down to y^2=t^2+4t+13 right? then you square root both sides? you should get y=+ or - sqrt(...) since both +sqrt(...) and -sqrt(...) will satisfy that equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K