How do you find the distance to the galaxies having equal diameter?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iVenky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diameter Galaxies
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods used to determine the distance to galaxies that are assumed to have the same diameter as the Milky Way. Participants explore the application of triangulation and the implications of assuming equal sizes for distant galaxies, referencing Richard Feynman's work.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the triangulation method for measuring distances to galaxies, using the angular size and assumed diameter of the Milky Way as a basis for calculation.
  • Another participant questions the validity of assuming all galaxies have the same size, suggesting that this could lead to significant inaccuracies in distance measurements.
  • Some participants argue that the assumption of equal sizes is not scientifically rigorous, highlighting the variability in galaxy sizes.
  • Conversely, a later reply defends the initial assumption, stating that while galaxies are not all the same size, the method can yield useful approximations for distance calculations.
  • Participants discuss the potential for using other methods, such as standard candles, to refine distance measurements and assess galaxy sizes more accurately.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the assumption that all galaxies are of equal size, with some arguing it is a flawed premise while others suggest it can still provide a useful approximation for distance calculations. The discussion remains unresolved on this point.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about galaxy sizes, and the discussion highlights the dependence on these assumptions for the accuracy of distance measurements. The mathematical steps involved in triangulation are not fully resolved.

iVenky
Messages
212
Reaction score
12
I am reading Richard Feynman's book Vol I. There he tells us how people usually used to find out the distance to some distant objects. I understand triangulation for objects that are near to the Earth or for stars that are near to our solar system. But how did they use the same principle to find out the distance to those galaxies(which have the same diameter of our galaxy) that are far away from the Earth ?

Here's the excerpt-

"Knowing the size of our own galaxy, we have a key to the measurement of still larger distances- the distances to others galaxies. Figure 5-7 is a photograph of a galaxy, which has much the same shape as our own. Probably it is the same size, too. (Other evidence supports the idea that galaxies are all about the same size.) If it is the same size as ours, we can tell its distance. We measure the angle it subtends in the sky; we know its diameter and we compute its distance -triangulation again"

Can someone help me?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
iVenky said:
But how did they use the same principle to find out the distance to those galaxies(which have the same diameter of our galaxy) that are far away from the Earth ?
Take a pen and a piece of paper. Draw an elongated equilateral triangle with vertex A being the observer, and vertices B and C marking the edges of the observed galaxy.
Simple measurements allow us to name the angle at vertex A - it is the angular size of an object on the celestial sphere. For example, for the Andromeda galaxy it's over 3 degrees.
By assuming that the observed galaxy is of the same size, we are given the length of the distance BC - the same as the size of Milky Way, so ~100 000 ly.

This gives us enough information to calculate the distance using simple trigonometric relations. In the case of our Andromeda example, this nets a result of ~2 million ly, which is not a bad approximation for the ~2,5 million ly of actual distance.
 
Wait a second here. Assuming the size of a galaxy is a big assumption.
This method could give extremely inaccurate results. All galaxies the same size? I think not my friend.
Size of galaxies will most probably vary as much as the sizes of the stars. Some can be many magnitudes larger then our own. So in all probability galaxies will follow suit. If this is so then judging distant in this methods would be grossly inaccurate. No?
 
solar71 said:
Wait a second here. Assuming the size of a galaxy is a big assumption.

We don't assume a galaxy is a certain size without good reason.
 
A lot of hand waving, especially for someone like Feynman.
 
"Probably it is the same size, too. (Other evidence supports the idea that galaxies are all about the same size.)"

This is what I was talking about "PROBABLY" it is the same size." that doesn't sound very scientific to me.
All about the same size... I don't think so.
 
solar71 said:
"Probably it is the same size, too. (Other evidence supports the idea that galaxies are all about the same size.)"

This is what I was talking about "PROBABLY" it is the same size." that doesn't sound very scientific to me.
All about the same size... I don't think so.

You're missing the point.
Of course galaxies are not all exactly of the same size. The exercise with calculating distances with the equal size assumption shows that it is possible to get ballpark results by using simple assumptions. It doesn't matter if a galaxy is in actuality half the size or five times the size of ours, you'll get the distance that is accurate to within one order of magnitude, where otherwise you'd have nothing.

You can then try to check or narrow the result by trying to measure the actual size. You can do it e.g., by using standard candles to find out the distance, at which point calculating the size is trivial.
You'll find out then, that the initial assumption of equal sizes was a very good one, especially when comparing galaxies of similar visible macrostructure, that is, spiral galaxies with spiral galaxies etc. - just as it was explained in the quote from Feynman in the OP.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
991
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K