MHB How Do You Find the Length x in a Geometric Problem with Shaded Areas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
Find the length x if the shaded area is 1200 cm^2

I tried to solve this is what I get

since $A_{triangle}=(\frac{1}{2})({x-1})(x)$

and $A_{rectangle}=x$

$A_{rectangle}+A_{triangle}=2400$

Is the set-up of my equation correct?
 

Attachments

  • stewart problem 1.3.png
    stewart problem 1.3.png
    1,002 bytes · Views: 90
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why are you using $x-1$ in the area of the triangle?
 
MarkFL said:
Why are you using $x-1$ in the area of the triangle?

I see it. $A_{TRI}=\frac{1}{2}(x^2)$

now I will have

$\frac{1}{2}(x^2)+x=2400$

solving for x $(x-48)(x+50)=0$

$x=48 in.$ :D
 
Well, you actually have:

$$\frac{1}{2}x^2+x=1200$$

or:

$$x^2+2x-2400=0$$

$$(x+50)(x-48)=0$$

Discarding the negative root, we then find:

$$x=48\text{ cm}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top