How do you multiply permutations?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JessBrown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permutations
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the multiplication of permutations, specifically how to combine them using cycle notation. Participants explore the mechanics of permutation multiplication, addressing confusion regarding the application and interpretation of permutations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jess expresses confusion about how to multiply permutations, specifically with examples a = (45)(67) and b = (46)(57).
  • One participant explains the process of applying permutations step-by-step, showing how a leads to c through specific mappings.
  • Jess questions the validity of the claim that multiplying any two permutations results in the third, citing a discrepancy in the expected outcome.
  • Another participant suggests that Jess may be misinterpreting the set of numbers being permuted and clarifies the notation used.
  • Jess acknowledges potential misunderstanding due to wording and seeks help in articulating the multiplication process correctly.
  • A participant emphasizes that the term "multiply" may be misleading, suggesting that it is more about "combining" permutations rather than traditional multiplication.
  • Clarifications are provided regarding the order of applying permutations and the importance of using an independent set of numbers for accurate results.
  • Jess attempts to apply the permutations to a random set of numbers and reports success in understanding the process after further guidance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit varying levels of understanding and interpretation of permutation multiplication, with some expressing confusion and others providing clarifications. No consensus is reached on the initial misunderstanding, but there is a shared effort to clarify the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of correctly applying permutations to an independent set of numbers and the potential for confusion arising from terminology and notation.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in combinatorial mathematics, particularly those studying permutations and their applications in various mathematical contexts.

JessBrown
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi
I'm having a little bit of trouble understanding about permutations, and how you multiply them? Say I have the permutations a = (45)(67), b = (46)(57) how do I multiply them?
Thanks heaps!
Jess
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Starting from a, [4567], the first permutation yields b, [5476]. Appying the second permutation yields c, [7654]. Hence the permutation which permutes a to c is (47)(56).
 
Thanks, I'm having trouble with another question though, when it says that if I have three different permutations,
a = (45)(67)
b = (46)(57)
c = (47)(56)
I have to multiply them to show that if multiply any two, you'll get the third...
Taking what you've said above,

4567 x (45)(67) gives 5476, then x (46)(57) = 7654 which does not equal (47)(56)

where am I going wrong?

Thanks
 
So, a, [4567] becomes c, [7654], hence 4->7 5->6 6->5 7->4. You see that there are two cycles, the first one is formed by 4->7 and 7->4, (47) for short. The other one is 5->6 and 6->5, (56) for short. So the total permutation is (47)(56). Maybe you are mixing up the set of numbers to be permuted (which I put in square brackets) and the cycle notation?
 
Thanks,
I think its just the wording and I'm interpreting it wrong, cos it says show how when
(45)(67) is multiplied by (46)(57) the result is (47)(56)

So to write it out I say (45)(67) goes to (54)(76) then when multiplied by (46)(57) this becomes (76)(54) which then when apply c (47)(56) becomes (45)(67) which is the original answer? I think I sort of get it just the wording is really difficult!

If you could help me with the wording to show how a x b = c, that would be amazing! Thanks
 
Perhaps it is the word "multiply" that is bothering you. What we are really doing is "combining" the permutations, not "multiplying" in the arithmetic sense.

4567 x (45)(67) means "first apply the (45)(67) permutation, then the 4567 permutation".

(45)(67) means that we swap 4 and 5 and swap 6 and 7 while leaving all other number the same- 1234567 is mapped to 1235476.

4567 means 4 is changed to 5, 5 to 6, 6 to 7, and 7 to 4- 1234567 is mapped to 1235674

Putting those together, (45)(67) maps 4 to 5 and then 4567 changes that 5 to 6: 4 is mapped to 6. (45)(67) maps 5 to 4 and then 4567 changes that 4 to 5: 5 is mapped to 5. (45)(67) maps 6 to 7 and then 4567 changes that 7 to 4: 6 is mapped to 4. (45)(67) maps 7 to 6 and then 4567 changes that 6 to 7: 7 is mapped to 7. In other words, all number except 4 and 6 remain the same and they are swapped:
(4567) (45)(67)= (46).

DrDu is using a different convention going from left to right rather than right to left.

If we apply (4567) first, then (45)(67)
1) 4 is changed to 5 then back to 4: 4->4
2) 5 is changed to 6 then to 7: 5-> 7
3) 6 is changed to 7, then back to 6: 6->6
4) 7 is changed to 4, then to 5: 5-> 7
(4567) (45)(67)= (47).

I guess the real question is, when you say "4567 x (45)(67) gives 5476", how are you getting that?
 
Thank you for replying and clearing that up, I still don't entirely understand (I'm so sorry, I'm really trying to!)

So if I'm combining (45)(67) and (46)(57) to get (47)(56)

I go (45)(67) (the original) becomes (54)(76)
then combined with (46)(57) becomes (76)(54) which then I am stuck as I don't see how this results in (47)(56)

Thank you so much for your patience with me!
 
"I go (45)(67) (the original) becomes (54)(76)"
You are trying to permute the numbers in the cycles of the permutation symbols. That's wrong!
Only apply the permutations to an independent set of numbers (I wrote [4567]).
 
Ok so if I go a random set of numbres, [7654]
by applying the first permutation 'a = (45)(67)', this becomes [6745]
then apply the second permutation 'b=(46)(57)', it becomes [4567] which is equal to taking the first set of numbers [7654] and applying 'c=(47)(56)' to get [4567].

Is this right? Finally! Thank you so much for all your help everyone!
 
  • #10
Sounds good :-)
You should learn to read of the cycles directly from the unpermuted and the permuted set of numbers.
 
  • #11
Thank you so much for your help! I kinda get it now! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K