How Do You Prove a Sigma Notation Equality Using Induction?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the equality of the sigma notation \(\sum_{i=0}^{2n-1}(3i+1) = n(6n-1)\) using mathematical induction for all positive integers \(n\). The proof begins by establishing the base case for \(n=1\) and then assumes the statement holds for \(n=m\). The next step involves demonstrating the case for \(n=m+1\) by manipulating the sigma notation and applying the inductive hypothesis. The hint provided by a forum member was crucial in guiding the proof process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with sigma notation
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of polynomial expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study mathematical induction techniques in detail
  • Learn about sigma notation and its properties
  • Practice algebraic manipulation of polynomial equations
  • Explore examples of proofs involving sigma notation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mathematics, particularly those focusing on algebra and proof techniques, as well as educators seeking to enhance their teaching strategies in mathematical induction.

jesusjones
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2n-1
Sigma (3i+1) = n(6n-1)
i=0

prove for all positive n


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



It holds true for n=1

5=5

then P: m+1

2m+1
Sigma(3i+1) = (m+1)(6(m+1)-1) or 6m^2 + 11m + 5
i=0

then 2m+1
Sigma(3i+1) = m(6m-1) + (3(m+1)+1) + (3(m+2)+1) = 6m^2 + 5m + 11
i=0

I just cannot figure this out and it is driving me crazy. Please help clarify things. I even tried changing the first part to
2m
Ʃ(3(i-1)+1)
i=1

and still couldn't prove it.

Thanks for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jesusjones said:

Homework Statement



2n-1
Sigma (3i+1) = n(6n-1)
i=0

prove for all positive n

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



It holds true for n=1

5=5
...
Hello jesusjones. Welcome to PF.

Now, assume that it holds for n = m, (where m ≥ 1), so you assume the following is true.
\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{2m-1}(3i+1)= m(6m-1)\,.​
With that assumption, you now need to show that this formulation is true for n = m+1. In this case, 2n-1 = 2(m+1)-1 = 2m+1, and n(6n-1)= (m+1)(6m+5)= 6m2+11m+5 . In other words, show that the following can be derived from the above.
\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{2m+1}(3i+1) = (m+1)(6m+5)\,.​

Here's a hint:
\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{2m+1}(3i+1)=(3(2m)+1)+(3(2m+1)+1)+\sum_{i=0}^{2m-1}(3i+1)\,.​
 
Thank you SammyS for your reply your hint lead me to the proper proof. I was having a hard time figuring out why it would be (3(2m)+1) and (3(2m+1)+1) instead of just (3(m+1)+1) ect... But i think i get it now.

Thanks very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K