MHB How Do You Solve cosh(x) = 3 for x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
find x
$\displaystyle\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2}=3$

ok we have the indenty of

$$\displaystyle\cosh{x}=\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2}$$

presume then the x can be replaced by 3

$$\displaystyle\cosh{3}=\frac{e^3+e^{-3}}{2}$$

ok $W\vert A$ returns

$x = \ln(3 \pm 2 \sqrt 2)$

ok so how??
 

Attachments

  • cup_t.png
    cup_t.png
    960 bytes · Views: 100
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
find x
$\displaystyle\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2}=3$

ok we have the indenty of

$$\displaystyle\cosh{x}=\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2}$$

presume then the x can be replaced by 3

$$\displaystyle\cosh{3}=\frac{e^3+e^{-3}}{2}$$

ok $W\vert A$ returns

$x = \ln(3 \pm 2 \sqrt 2)$

ok so how??

What I would do is multiply the original equation by \(2e^x\) so that we have:

$$e^{2x}+1=6e^x$$

Arrange in standard quadratic form:

$$e^{2x}-6e^x+1=0$$

Apply quadratic formula:

$$e^x=\frac{-(-6)\pm\sqrt{(-6)^2-4(1)(1)}}{2(1)}=\frac{6\pm\sqrt{32}}{2}=3\pm2\sqrt{2}$$

Both roots are positive, thus:

$$x=\ln\left(3\pm2\sqrt{2}\right)$$
 
What you are "doing wrong" is that you are "going the wrong way"!

You titled this "Evaluate cosh(3)" and that is what you did. But the problem you state is to solve cosh(x)= 3 for x.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Back
Top