How Do You Solve for Charges Using Coulomb's Law Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter exitwound
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving for charges using Coulomb's Law, specifically the equation F = kQq/d². Participants detail their attempts to isolate charges Qb and Qc based on the forces exerted on charge A by charges B and C. The key conclusion is that the ratio of charges Qc/Qb is determined to be 1.328 through the manipulation of force equations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly accounting for the direction of forces when applying Coulomb's Law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and its equation F = kQq/d²
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills for isolating variables
  • Knowledge of electric charge interactions (positive and negative forces)
  • Familiarity with ratios and proportions in physics equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Coulomb's Law in electrostatics
  • Learn how to manipulate equations involving multiple variables and forces
  • Explore the concept of electric field strength and its relation to charge
  • Investigate the implications of charge ratios in electrostatic problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to Coulomb's Law and charge interactions.

exitwound
Messages
291
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



problem1.jpg


Homework Equations



F=kQq/d^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried working on this for two days and can't figure it out.

In (a), the cumulative force on A is the sum of the force from B and the force from C. or:

F=\frac{k Q_a Q_b}{d^2} + \frac{k Q_a Q_c}{d^2}

In (b), the same applies.

however, I can't figure out what to do with these equations in order to isolate Qb or Qc. If I use a negative d (-d) as a distance from A-->B in (b), then I get two equations that are identical, but shouldn't be. If I move the origin, it doesn't seem to matter either.

I don't know how to start this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Qc/Qb=1.328 (sorry)

Ok, so in the first scenario, both charges B and C exert forces to the left, on charge A, since all charges are positive. However, in figure b, charge b exerts a force to the right, while charge C exerts a force to the left, on charge a. Hence, in fig. a,
-2.03x10^-23==-kQAQB/r^2-kQAQC/r^2
while in fig b
-2.86x10^-24==-kQAQC/r^2+kQAQB/r^2

If you factor out k, QA, and r^2, keeping in mind that RB=RC (distance from a to b, and a to c are the same in both figures), and divide the two equations, you can get QC/QB which is 1.328

Hope this helps,
 
Last edited:
Because of the direction of the force you know that Qc is bigger than Qb so write an equation like you did for part a but getting the directions right.Now divide one equation by the other and tidy it up.
 
Dadface said:
Because of the direction of the force you know that Qc is bigger than Qb so write an equation like you did for part a but getting the directions right.Now divide one equation by the other and tidy it up.

You are correct, QC should be larger than Qb, but when I worked it out, I got QC/QB==1.328, I don't know why...

corrected, see above, I had a problem with the signs in my initial equation...
 
Last edited:
I'm still absolutely lost on this.

Faraday, I understand what you did taking into account the negative Force due to B in the second example. However, I don't know what to do with the equations at this point.

I end up with:

(a) F=(kQa/d^2)(Qb+Qc)

(b) F=(kQa/d^2)(Qc-Qb)

I don't understand where to go from here.
 
exitwound said:
I'm still absolutely lost on this.

Faraday, I understand what you did taking into account the negative Force due to B in the second example. However, I don't know what to do with the equations at this point.

I end up with:

(a) F=(kQa/d^2)(Qb+Qc)

(b) F=(kQa/d^2)(Qc-Qb)

I don't understand where to go from here.

You can now divide the two equations above, so F1/F2==(QB+QC)/(QC-QB), hence, qc/qb is 1.328. (I had a problem with my signs in the initial solution.)
 
Last edited:
Why should I do that? I am not following the logic, I guess.
 
exitwound said:
Why should I do that? I am not following the logic, I guess.

Both equations have "d", which you don't know but can eliminate by dividing the equations. After dividing, you have the ratio F1/F2, which you can calculate, as well as Qb and Qc. You'll have to rearrange to get an expression for the ratio Qb/Qc.
 
Okay. 1.328 is right, and I did the simplification on paper here as well. Ends up looking like:

\frac{Q_c}{Q_b} = \frac {F_1+F_2}{F_1-F_2}

I don't know if I ever would have figured out to divide one by the other though.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K