How Do You Solve the Action Integral for a Free Particle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dydxforsn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the action integral for a free particle in the context of quantum mechanics and path integrals, specifically referencing Feynman's work. The original poster is attempting to understand the formulation of the action, S, which is expressed in terms of kinetic energy without any potential energy considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the action integral but struggles with the reasoning behind the substitution for velocity. Some participants inquire about the specific expressions used for ##dx/dt## and suggest that the original poster reconsider the relationship between position and time.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the approach to the problem. The original poster has identified a misunderstanding regarding the use of velocity in the integral, and there is a recognition of the need to consider boundary conditions in the context of the action as a functional. The discussion is productive, with guidance being offered without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses frustration over their understanding of the problem, indicating a possible lack of familiarity with the concepts involved in action and path integrals. There is an emphasis on the importance of recognizing the implications of boundary values in the problem setup.

dydxforsn
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve this simple problem (it's the first problem of Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals by Feynman, I feel like an idiot not being able to do it...) It's just solving for the action, S, of a free particle (no potential, only kinetic energy..)

So it should just be [tex]S = \int_{t_a}^{t_b}{\frac{m}{2} (\frac{dx}{dt})^2 dt}[/tex]
which according to the book is simply [tex]S = \frac{m}{2} \frac{(x_b - x_a)^2}{t_b - t_a}[/tex]

I've tried a couple of different ways to reason myself into this solution but I can't seem to figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far? What did you plug in for ##dx/dt##?
 
Mute said:
What have you tried so far?

Incredibly wrong stuff, heh..

Mute said:
What did you plug in for ##dx/dt##?

Yeah I'm an idiot. I was supposed to just plug in [itex]v = \left ( \frac{x_{b} - x_{a}}{t_{b} - t_{a}} \right )[/itex] because 'v' is constant from the Euler-Lagrange equation..

Thanks for helping me see what should have been obvious >_< I was hell bent on doing things symbolically and didn't seem to care about the appearance of the end point 'x' values.. These should have been very suggestive.
 
Last edited:
Great! You figured it out! Yeah, with a problem like this it helps to remember that the action is a functional of ##x(t)## and ##\dot{x}(t)##, so you get different answers depending on which function x(t) you use. Of course, varying the action with respect to x(t) (giving the Euler-Lagrange equations) yields the equation of motion for the classical path. The problem wanted the action of a classical path with boundary values ##x(t_a) = x_a## and ##x(t_b) = x_b##.

It can take some practice seeing these sorts of problems a few times before it clicks. =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K