How to integrate velocity squared to solve action integral?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around calculating the action integral for a force-free mass point in one-dimensional space, specifically focusing on the Lagrangian and the integration of velocity squared over time.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to define the Lagrangian as L=1/2mv^2 and questions the integration of v^2 with respect to time. Some participants note the necessity of knowing how velocity varies with time or position to proceed with the integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the conditions under which the integral can be solved. Some guidance has been provided about the need for additional information on velocity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of constant versus variable velocity and the assumptions related to the potential energy in the absence of forces.

nabeel17
Messages
57
Reaction score
1
Consider a forcefree mass point in one-dimensional space.
(a) Calculate the action S for the actual path of the mass point in the time interval
[0, T] and for the boundary conditions x(0) = 0 and x(T) = d.

I said the Lagrangian was just equal to L=1/2mv^2. I'm not sure if my reasoning for this is correct (I may have a conceptual error) but since there is no force acting on it, the potential is 0 (or a constant but it can be set to 0?)

so the action integral is S=∫1/2mv^2dt where the limits are 0-T

I'm not sure how to integrate v^2 with respect to t. Even if my approach is wrong, I would still like to know how that integral is done
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oops, velocity would be constant...so that solves that. However, if it wasn't constant, how would I go about solving that integral?
 
You cannot solve it without some information about how velocity varies with time.
 
You need to either know v(t) or v(x). If you know the second then you can use the fact that v2dt=vdx.
 
ahh, ok. Thank you
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K