MHB How Do You Solve This Geometric Progression Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a geometric progression where the second term is 6 and the fifth term is 48. By setting up the equation 6r^3 = 48, the common ratio (r) is determined to be 2. Consequently, the first term (a) is calculated to be 3 using the formula a_n = a_1 * r^(n-1). The discussion also touches on finding the number of terms in the progression, with a total sum of 381 mentioned. The calculations confirm the values for the first term and common ratio in the geometric progression.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
If the second term is 6 and the 5th term of a geometric progression is 48.Find the first term and the common difference of it

The sum of certain number of terms of the above progression from first term is 381.Find the number of terms of it.

Any ideas on how to begin ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"common difference" should be common ratio.

Using the given information, we may set up the equation

$$6r^3=48$$

Do you see how that equation is derived? Can you solve it for $r$?
 
greg1313 said:
"common difference" should be common ratio.

Using the given information, we may set up the equation

$$6r^3=48$$

Do you see how that equation is derived? Can you solve it for $r$?

The second term is 6 & it is given that the fifth term is 48. As geometric progression increment by the multiplication by the common ratio , the second term must be multiplied by three times the common ratio.

$$6r^3=48$$
$$r^3=8$$
$$r=2$$

Now the common ratio has been found, so now finding the first term can be eased using the formula an=arn-1

3 = a
 
Good work! You are correct.

$$a_n=a_{n-1}\cdot r$$

$$a_2=a_1\cdot r$$

$$a_2=2a_1$$

$$6=2a_1\implies a_1=3$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top