How Does Balloon Volume Change During Ocean Descents?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a rubber balloon filled with helium as it is submerged deeper into the ocean. Participants are considering both adiabatic and equilibrium descent scenarios, focusing on how the volume of the balloon changes under increasing hydrostatic pressure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the relationship between the balloon's radius and tensile stress, questioning how these factors interact under varying depths. There is discussion on the applicability of the ideal gas law and other relevant equations in different scenarios, including isothermal and adiabatic conditions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various insights and equations being shared. Some participants are questioning the assumptions made about the balloon's behavior at significant depths, while others are suggesting different modeling approaches to understand the volume changes better.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the balloon reaching a point where it may not retain its original shape, raising questions about the physical limits of the balloon's elasticity and the behavior of gases under extreme conditions. Participants note that certain equations may not be applicable at greater depths.

guv
Messages
122
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
What happens to a rubber balloon in reality when you take it down into deep ocean?
Relevant Equations
ideal gas law, van der waals equation, surface tension, elasticity, plasticity, Karan-Guth stress-strain relation , hydrostatic pressure, bulk modulus
Hey fellow physics enthusiasts, how might the volume of a balloon change as you bring it down deep into the ocean (consider both adiabatic (quick) and equilibrium (slow) descend).

Looking for insights what most likely will happen, for simplicity we can start with a thin (##t << R##) elastic rubber balloon filled with Helium that will exhibit ideal gas behavior through out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
guv said:
Homework Statement:: What happens to a rubber balloon in reality when you take it down into deep ocean?
Relevant Equations:: ideal gas law, van der waals equation, surface tension, elasticity, plasticity, Karan-Guth stress-strain relation , hydrostatic pressure, bulk modulus

Hey fellow physics enthusiasts, how might the volume of a balloon change as you bring it down deep into the ocean (consider both adiabatic (quick) and equilibrium (slow) descend).

Looking for insights what most likely will happen, for simplicity we can start with a thin (##t << R##) elastic rubber balloon filled with Helium that will exhibit ideal gas behavior through out.
This is a homework forum, so tell us what you think and why.
Some of the relevant equations you list can be readily discarded.
 
I suspect most of the difficulty here is to determine the relationship between the radius ##r## of the balloon and the tensile stress ##\sigma_t##, considering that ##\sigma_t = \sigma_t(\frac{\Delta r}{r_0})## will probably be a very non-linear function of ##\frac{\Delta r}{r_0}## for a rubber balloon.

We can consider a quasi-static lowering of the balloon in both the isothermal case and the adiabatic case. The balloon will have a thickness ##t \ll r_0## and we'll call the tensile stress in the balloon ##\sigma_t##. Now let's derive the equilibrium case, $$2\pi r t \sigma_t = \pi r^2 \Delta p \implies \Delta p = \frac{2t\sigma_t}{r}$$If we can assume that the depth ##z## below the surface is small relative to the balloon radius, then we can write that in the isothermal case$$p_i = mgz + \frac{2t\sigma_t}{r} \implies \frac{nRT}{V} = mgz + 2t\sigma_t \left(\frac{3V}{4\pi}\right)^{-\frac{1}{3}}$$whilst in the adiabatic (but still quasi-static, here) case $$(p_0 V_0^{\gamma})V^{-\gamma} = mgz + 2t\sigma_t \left(\frac{3V}{4\pi}\right)^{-\frac{1}{3}}$$both of these would let you solve for ##V(z)## but it's not clear how useful that is without any functional form for ##\sigma_t(\frac{\Delta r}{r_0})##.

I too hope someone can add their insights to this problem!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your equations are a good start but the original question is about taking the balloon much deeper than a depth that is small relative to the balloon radius. When you take the balloon deep down enough, there will be a point where the balloon reaches its uninflated radius r0 in which case the skin of the balloon becomes relaxed and is no longer part of the picture. Deeper than this point, the balloon will not retain its original shape, but will be scrunched up in some fashion. Exactly what fashion depends on how you model it. I would go with quasi static isothermal compression in which case ##V\sim \dfrac{1}{p}##.

I think the scrunching will be similar to what happens when you lower the temperature of the gas inside as seen in this video. Note the difference between the two balloons. The blue one is filled with a mixture of nitrogen, oxygen, and CO2 from the guy's breath. At the boiling point of liquid nitrogen (77K), the oxygen is probably liquefied, the CO2 is most likely solid and the nitrogen is close to its liquefaction point. This means a huge loss of volume and that the gas inside cannot be considered ideal. The red balloon is filled with helium that has a boiling point of 4.2 K at atmospheric pressure which means that it is pretty much still an ideal gas at 77 K. The two balloons together show what the balloon imagined by the OP might look like at intermediate depth (red) and great depth (blue).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
40K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K