MHB How Does Cigarette Consumption Relate to Heart Disease Deaths?

aprilryan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I just need a little assistance on the last two questions. I place per capita and death in L1 and L2 but I am lost.

Country Per Capita Cigarette Consumption
3900
United States 3350
Canada 3220
Australia 3220
New Zealand 2790
United Kingdom 2770
Ireland 2290
Finland 2160
West Germany 1890
Netherlands 1810
Austria 1770
Belgium 1700
Mexico 1680
Italy 1510
Sweden 1270
Spain 1200
Norway 1090

Deaths from Coronary Heart Disease (per 100,000)
259.9
211.6
238.1
211.6
238.1
211.8
194.1
187.3
110.5
233.1
150.3
124.7
182.1
118.1
31.9
114.3
126.9
43.9
136.3

3. What does the coefficient of determination indicate about the relationship?
Would the coefficient of 0.607 indicate there's a link between the variables?4. Use the data above to predict the number of death (per 100,000) in a country with a per capita consumption of cigarettes of 2000.

Would the ax+b equation be useful here?

Sorry, I know this one is a little long.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nevermind I got i!
 
aprilryan said:
Nevermind I got i!

Would you mind posting your solution for the benefit of the community?
 
Sure! I got 0.607.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top