How does dy/dt=ry end up with the constant multiple on the right?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter oneamp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Multiple
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The differential equation dy/dt = ry leads to the solution y = e^(rt) + C, where C represents the constant of integration. However, the correct form considering initial conditions is y = y_0 * e^(rt), with y_0 being the value of y at t=0. The confusion arises from the placement of the constant of integration; it should be applied immediately after integration, not after logarithmic manipulation. This ensures that the constant is correctly represented as a new constant in the exponential form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with integration techniques
  • Knowledge of exponential functions
  • Ability to apply initial conditions in mathematical solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integrating factors in differential equations
  • Learn about initial value problems in differential equations
  • Explore the properties of exponential functions and their applications
  • Review the concept of constants of integration in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians, and anyone studying differential equations who seeks clarity on the application of initial conditions and integration constants.

oneamp
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
I have, from the textbook:

dy/dt = ry

So I solve and get y = e^(rt)+C

However, the book says that y=y_0 * e^(rt), where y_0 is the answer to the initial condition, y(0).

I don't get it. The + C should be what we use to solve for the initial condition; how does y_0 end up in the same term with the exponential?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
integrating dy/y=rdt leads to ln(y)=rt+C

this leads to y=exp(rt+C)
but exp(rt+C)=exp(C)*exp(rt)
and you simply replace the constant exp(C) by a new constant C

EDIT: your mistake was most likely that you didn't include the constant of integration immediately after integrating, but after getting rid of the logarithm.
 
Yes! I see. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K