How Does Graviton Polarization Affect Tensor Field Interactions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graviton
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the treatment of the graviton as a symmetric 2-index tensor field, specifically focusing on its interaction with a symmetric current tensor that satisfies a conservation law. Participants are exploring the implications of the Lagrangian provided, which includes terms for the graviton field and its coupling to the current tensor.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest alternative methods for solving the equations of motion, including viewing the graviton model as analogous to a harmonic oscillator. Others express uncertainty about the interpretation of the Lagrangian and seek clarification on specific steps in the problem-solving process.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations and methods being explored. Some participants have offered insights into potential simplifications, while others are requesting further guidance on their attempts to understand the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note their varying levels of familiarity with field theory, which influences their approaches to the problem. There is also mention of specific challenges in deriving certain expressions from the Lagrangian, indicating a need for careful consideration of the mathematical details involved.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



We will treat the graviton as a symmetric ##2##-index tensor field. It couples to a current ##T_{\mu\nu}## also symmetric in its two indices, which satisfies the conservation law ##\partial_{\mu}T_{\mu\nu}=0##.

(a) Assume the Lagrangian is ##\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\Box h_{\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}h_{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}.## Solve ##h_{\mu\nu}##'s equations of motion, and substitute back to find an interaction like ##T_{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{k^{2}}T_{\mu\nu}##.

(b) Write out the ##10## terms in the interaction ##T_{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{k^{2}}T_{\mu\nu}## explicitly in terms of ##T_{00}, T_{01},## etc.

(c) Use current conservation to solve for ##T_{\mu 1}## in terms of ##T_{\mu 0}, \omega## and ##\kappa##. Substitute into simplify the interaction. How many causally propagating degrees of freedom are there?

(d) Add to the interaction another term of the form ##cT_{\mu\mu}\frac{1}{k^{2}}T_{\nu\nu}##. What value of ##c## can reduce the number of propagating modes? How many are there now?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



(a) ##\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial h_{\mu\nu}}=-\frac{1}{2}\Box h_{\mu\nu}+\frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}T_{\mu\nu}##

I'm having trouble finding ##\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})}##:

##\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})} = \frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})}\Big( -\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\partial_{\sigma}\partial^{\sigma}h_{\mu\nu} \Big) = \frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})}\Big( -\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\eta^{\sigma\rho}\partial_{\sigma}\partial_{\rho}h_{\mu\nu} \Big)=-\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\eta^{\sigma\rho}\partial_{\sigma}\frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})}(\partial_{\rho}h_{\mu\nu})##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are going about this problem the hard way. This model for the graviton is clearly an harmonic oscillator. You know from your studies of Lagrangian dynamics of the electro-magnetic field that the solution for the propagating E field, is E(r,t) = E0ei(k⋅r-ωt). I propose you generalize this to the graviton field by positing the solution hμν = Aμeikνxν, where Aμ is a constant vector independent of x and t. I suggest you expand this solution in a 4x4 matrix and use the fact that the matrix is symmetrical in its indices to make it a constant, say A0, multiplying the complex exponential terms and thus reduce the 16 terms to 10 terms.
 
Fred Wright said:
I think you are going about this problem the hard way. This model for the graviton is clearly an harmonic oscillator.

How did you figure out that this model for the graviton is a harmonic oscillator?
 
failexam said:
How did you figure out that this model for the graviton is a harmonic oscillator?
By looking at the form of the Lagrangian and the hints given in the problem.
 
Fred Wright said:
By looking at the form of the Lagrangian and the hints given in the problem.

I am very new to field theory, so I still cannot figure out from the form of the Lagrangian and the hints in the problem that the graviton is modeled as a harmonic oscillator. It's best if I follow the precise instructions in the problem, rather than taking ingenious shortcuts.

Would you be able to point out my mistakes in part (a)?
 
I would expand the quad operator to its explicit form then operate on all elements of hμν. Using the Lagrangian formalism for each element of hμν will give differential equations for that element from which you will get constants of motion and guess the solution (i.e. a constant multiplying a complex exponential).
 
Would you be able to provide the first few lines of the solution so that I could work out the remaining steps?
 
failexam said:

Homework Statement



We will treat the graviton as a symmetric ##2##-index tensor field. It couples to a current ##T_{\mu\nu}## also symmetric in its two indices, which satisfies the conservation law ##\partial_{\mu}T_{\mu\nu}=0##.

(a) Assume the Lagrangian is ##\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\Box h_{\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}h_{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}.## Solve ##h_{\mu\nu}##'s equations of motion, and substitute back to find an interaction like ##T_{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{k^{2}}T_{\mu\nu}##.

(b) Write out the ##10## terms in the interaction ##T_{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{k^{2}}T_{\mu\nu}## explicitly in terms of ##T_{00}, T_{01},## etc.

(c) Use current conservation to solve for ##T_{\mu 1}## in terms of ##T_{\mu 0}, \omega## and ##\kappa##. Substitute into simplify the interaction. How many causally propagating degrees of freedom are there?

(d) Add to the interaction another term of the form ##cT_{\mu\mu}\frac{1}{k^{2}}T_{\nu\nu}##. What value of ##c## can reduce the number of propagating modes? How many are there now?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



(a) ##\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial h_{\mu\nu}}=-\frac{1}{2}\Box h_{\mu\nu}+\frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}T_{\mu\nu}##

I'm having trouble finding ##\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})}##:

##\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})} = \frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})}\Big( -\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\partial_{\sigma}\partial^{\sigma}h_{\mu\nu} \Big) = \frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})}\Big( -\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\eta^{\sigma\rho}\partial_{\sigma}\partial_{\rho}h_{\mu\nu} \Big)=-\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\eta^{\sigma\rho}\partial_{\sigma}\frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})}(\partial_{\rho}h_{\mu\nu})##
I would first do an integration by parts on the term ##h_{\mu\nu}\partial_{\sigma}\partial^{\sigma}h_{\mu\nu}## to bring it in the form (after dropping the total derivative) $$ - (\partial_{\sigma} h_{\mu\nu}) \partial^{\sigma}h_{\mu\nu} = - g^{\sigma \delta} (\partial_{\sigma} h_{\mu\nu}) \partial_{\delta} h_{\mu\nu} $$ and then I would calculate ##\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\gamma}h_{\alpha\beta})}##. This will be simple to do now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K