How does increasing distance affect potential energy in an atom?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Helicobacter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Quantum number
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on how increasing distance affects potential energy in an atom, particularly in the context of atomic orbitals and the behavior of electrons under different energy conditions. It explores concepts of energy levels, kinetic energy, and the nature of potential energy in atomic systems versus classical systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that as the principal quantum number (n) increases, the orbitals become larger and the energy level increases, but there is disagreement about the speed of electrons in these orbitals.
  • One participant argues that electrons move more slowly for larger n, using a solar system analogy to illustrate that objects further from a central body move more slowly.
  • There is confusion regarding the distinction between higher energy and higher energy level, with participants questioning how energy addition affects electron speed in different contexts.
  • Another participant emphasizes that atomic orbitals are governed by quantum mechanics, which requires a redefinition of concepts like speed and orbitals compared to classical physics scenarios such as particle accelerators.
  • It is noted that in a particle accelerator, added energy increases kinetic energy, while in an atom, added energy increases potential energy for bound electrons.
  • Participants discuss the nature of potential energy related to the electrical attraction between electrons and the nucleus, with equations provided to describe this relationship.
  • There is a challenge regarding the interpretation of potential energy as distance increases, with some participants pointing out that increasing distance leads to less negative potential energy, while others clarify the definition of zero potential energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between energy levels, electron speed, and potential energy. There is no consensus on how to reconcile these concepts, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of defining zero potential energy and the implications of distance on potential energy calculations. The discussion reveals a reliance on different physical models (quantum mechanics vs. classical physics) that complicate the understanding of these concepts.

Helicobacter
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
The larger n, the longer the orbitals, the higher the energy level, and the higher the speed of electrons?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything sounds right, except the electrons move more slowly for larger n. Its easy to see this when you consider our solar system as a crude model for the atom. The further away an object is from the parent body (corresponding to larger n), the more slowly it moves.
 
I don't understand. Here it says, "as you add energy to the electron, it will go faster." So is there a distinction between higher energy and higher energy level?
 
Helicobacter said:
I don't understand. Here it says, "as you add energy to the electron, it will go faster." So is there a distinction between higher energy and higher energy level?

You are trying to use the same explanation for two DIFFERENT situations. You first asked about atomic orbitals. Now you are using particle accelerators. These two are not the same conditions and different rules apply.

Electrons in atomic orbitals are strictly governed by quantum mechanical rules. When such thing kicks in, then our concept of "orbitals" and "speed", etc. needs to be redefined, especially in how we describe the motion of electrons in an atom.

On the other hand, the JLab page you referred to is for FREE charges in which classical laws apply. The electrons are not bound in a potential that it can see (i.e. it doesn't see a potential boundary unlike the atomic case), and there aren't any wavefunction overlap between neighboring electrons. Classical physics kicks in, which is what most people use in describing charged particles in accelerators.

Zz.
 
In a particle accelerator, all the energy that you add to an electron goes into its kinetic energy, and therefore its speed increases. In an atom, the energy that you add to a bound electron goes into increasing its potential energy, not its kinetic energy.
 
what is this potential energy like?
 
It's the potential energy associated with the electrical attraction force between the electron and the nucleus:

[tex]F = \frac{k q_e q_{nuc}}{r^2}[/tex]

[tex]PE = - \frac{k q_e q_{nuc}}{r}[/tex]

As r increases, PE increases.
 
how does PE increase? the negative sign shows that increasing r relates to an increasingly negative PE...
 
It depends on what you define as zero potential energy. When the electron is located at a point infinitely far away it's potential energy is defined to be zero and the electron is free and not bound by the nucleus. As the electron moves closer to the nucleus it loses potential energy (the potential energy becomes more and more negative), accounting for the negative sign.
 
  • #10
xiankai said:
how does PE increase? the negative sign shows that increasing r relates to an increasingly negative PE...

Look at it more closely. As r increases, 1/r decreases, and -1/r increases (towards zero as a limit).

Or if you're having problems with the words, calculate a simple example. Let r increase from 10 to 20. Calculate -1/10 and -1/20, and plot them on the vertical axis of a graph. Which one is higher?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K