How Does Intake Taper Influence Engine Performance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5.0stang
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the influence of intake taper on engine performance, specifically in fuel injection systems. It highlights that intake runners typically range from 10-15 inches, compared to 4-6 inches for carbureted systems, yet both can perform effectively in similar RPM ranges. A taper of 1.7 to 2.5% increase in intake runner area per inch is optimal, translating to a 1-1.5° taper. The conversation also clarifies that measuring taper can be done through diameter comparisons at different points along the runner, using trigonometry to derive taper angles and percentage increases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fuel injection systems and their components
  • Knowledge of intake runner design and airflow dynamics
  • Familiarity with basic trigonometry for calculating taper angles
  • Experience with engine performance tuning and optimization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Intake Runner Design for Fuel Injection" to optimize airflow
  • Study "Calculating Taper Angles in Engine Components" for precise measurements
  • Explore "Effects of Runner Length on Engine Performance" for deeper insights
  • Learn about "Airflow Dynamics in Engine Tuning" to enhance performance
USEFUL FOR

Engine builders, automotive engineers, and performance tuners looking to optimize fuel injection systems and improve engine efficiency through effective intake design.

5.0stang
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Often I see talks about intake taper. This has brought on a few questions from me:)

I am trying to keep this on a Fuel Injection level. The intakes seem to have longer runners that range from 10-15 inches. Compared to carb intakes that are in the 4-6" range. How can they both perform in the same rpm range?

Okay anyways, this is the text I have questions from...

To further help fill the cylinder, it helps to have a high velocity at the back of the valve. To aid in this the intake port can be tapered. To be effective, there should be between 1.7 and 2.5% increase in intake runner area per inch of runner, which represents a 1-1.5° taper. For an example, let’s say you're looking for a 2% increase per inch taper on the 2.02" valve we discussed earlier. We already came up with a port area of 2.56 square inches at just before the valve. Now let’s say the total runner is 10 inches from the valve to the plenum and we're looking for a 2% per inch taper. This turns out to be a total of 3.12 square inches where the port meets the plenum. As you get near the 2.5% per inch taper point, you are pretty much at the limit of helping airflow. A larger taper will only hurt signal strength at the carburetor.

I see that intake taper is talked about in percentages and in degrees.

What is the difference?

On an intake, how can you measure intake taper in percentage or in degrees?

Thanks and I hope I did not make it too confusing to follow.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can't measure them in either. You have to assume (if you don't know for sure) that the walls are straight and measure different diameters at different locations (usually at the two ends) along the tube. Then the angle of taper or the percentage area increase can be calculated.

This is analogous to pipe threads, which are also tapered. They are tapered at .75" per foot , or 1°47'. The way that they are checked for acceptance is by checking diameters at gauge points along the axis of the thread.
 
Thanks for the quick response Fred Garvin.

So, let us say we have an entrance measurement of 2" x 1.75", and the exit measurements are 1.90" x 1.50".

Entrance area is 3.5" (squared) and the Exit area is 2.85" (squared).

Then let us say there is a 15" runner.

Can any taper percentage or degree measurements be made or assumed with the above information?
 
Unless I'm missing something huge, the taper angle can be obtained from simple trigonometry of measurements, and the percentage as defined in your original post, the amount of increase of runner area per inch of runner length.
 
I have encountered a vertically oriented hydraulic cylinder that is designed to actuate and slice heavy cabling into sections with a blade. The cylinder is quite small (around 1.5 inches in diameter) and has an equally small stroke. The cylinder is single acting (i.e. it is pressurized from the bottom, and vented to atmosphere with a spring return, roughly 200lbs of force on the spring). The system operates at roughly 2500 psi. Interestingly, the cylinder has a pin that passes through its...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
23K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K