Automotive Small block Chev (classic) exhaust notes/tuning physics etc

Click For Summary
A video exists showcasing a unique exhaust sound achieved by crossing header pipe leads, creating an exotic tone. The discussion centers on achieving a higher-pitched, Ferrari-like sound from a 327 Chevrolet engine without using 180-degree headers, which won't fit. Participants suggest that using shorty headers with larger diameters, along with an X-pipe and chambered mufflers, may help create the desired sound while maintaining performance. The engine is designed for a specific RPM range, and concerns about header clearance and exhaust tuning are prominent. Ultimately, replicating a Ferrari exhaust note on a cross-plane crank engine is challenging, with suggestions leaning towards specific header and muffler configurations to improve sound quality.
  • #31
Highspeed said:
I never followed Smokey enough to recall much about his indy efforts. I'm familiar with the de-stroked SBC turbo, but not enough to converse about it. The holes I were referring to were on a NASCAR engine and just for temp probes. NASCAR apparently thought it was cheating and said he couldn't run them. I respect Smokey; he thought deeper on engine function than most, thus was a pioneer and controversial. If you look at modern engines from the 80's on up you'll see the effects of his cross-ram work...most people just don't know it. Very interesting guy, and responsible for a lot of the information we have about airflow!

Faytmorgan, the sbf headers will not work on a sbc. Sbc heads have assymmetrical exhaust ports, except for some high-end aftermarket ones. There are lots of sbc shorty headers, and the equal length is really not that important as using them at all has just thrown any tuning of the exhaust right out the window. If you're using motor plates instead of mid-block mounts, you should have all kinds of exhaust room. You could fab up a header pretty easily. The anti-reverberation designs are claimed to help power at specific points (small ranges) in the power band. I've never dealt with them, so I can't help you much there.

I am aware that I would have to modify the port side (of the header of course) that goes to the head to make them work with a sbc. I would have to take mounting plates for a sbc and route Also equal length is very important from every bit of research I have done. There are those that don't say it matters until about 9 inches or so. From a tuners standpoint I disagree, I have found on the dyno that the equal length does matter as far as ease of tuning them.

I have "d ports" as for exhaust ports on my head, which is traditional chevy ports.

As for room, there isn't much, most people use the sanderson block hugger headers. I don't them at all. Nor do I like the owner of sanderson for many reasons. The biggest was that I had inquired about headers when I had called there and she blatantly hung up on me, I had called back and asked for another tech. the tech then told me that she was the owner. I don't know what her deal is but I will NEVER by sanderson for that very reason on its own. Also I personally (prior to this) have seen product issues from them from my customer's cars that I have worked on, as well as at Z meets where people have complained about them. She also defends openly on her idea that equal length does not matter when from all the experience I have had, as well as ed at headers by ed (he has been doing headers since 1962) have found. I tried to explain to her that, that is what I wanted, and that from experience any header that is not equal length within .5 of an inch of one another that they suck to tune and they are not a quality header because of this alone aside from build quality.

I could go on with this topic but it really doesn't matter at this point.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Yeah, I never knew about the holes and NASCAR, funny stuff though. Faytmorgan, I would just figure out the primary size, lengths and collector size and just build some. Just remember your exhaust system begins right at the exhaust seat's top cut.
 
  • #33
faytmorgan said:
She also defends openly on her idea that equal length does not matter when from all the experience I have had, as well as ed at headers by ed (he has been doing headers since 1962) have found. I tried to explain to her that, that is what I wanted, and that from experience any header that is not equal length within .5 of an inch of one another that they suck to tune and they are not a quality header because of this alone aside from build quality.

I could go on with this topic but it really doesn't matter at this point.
With uneven exhaust pulsing the need for equal length goes way down. For example, the driver's bank of a SBC is 270-180-90-180 and is why it has the "harley" sound. The pulses just aren't going to arrive at the right time, so spending a lot of time getting the tube lengths within 1/2 inch is essentially a waste of time; the engine won't know or care fore the most part and in quite a few cases the engine will like the unequal lengths better especially for the street.

I recently dynoed an LS engine that's going into a hot rod and compared the headers that I built to look good and fit in the space available with length being of minor concern against a set of equal length headers from one of the race cars; my headers made more hp and torque across the board and were no different to tune.

Not at all uncommon in my experience.
 
  • #34
So I found out that the headers (from bbk) yes, are indeed equal. Albeit they are 17.5 inches in length, the primaries that is. According to the length equation from "headers by ed" {(CID * 1900)/(rpm_max * tube_od2)} the recommended length is 34.2 inches.

This being said, what is going to change in using 17.5 inch primaries vs 34.2 inch primaries aside from a higher exhaust note?
 
  • #35
To fitment, pics of them in a mustang.

http://customerpics.americanmuscle.com/view/sku/56011.php?sort=1

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/attachments/94-95-tech/25070d1173998544-1994-mustang-gt-ignition-module-p1010125.jpg

Pictures of a used set from a forum
http://www.hardcore50.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=51387

I would have to make a down pipe of some kind. I would be bringing them down to an x pipe to spintech sportsmans to exit out the side.

This exhaust vid sounds 100% perfect to me, albeit its on a mustang. This is the goal of the setup, in that it sounds as close to that aside using a 5.0 block.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
http://forums.hybridz.org/index.php/topic/70271-diy-180-degreesingle-planeflat-plane-v-8-crankshaft%e2%80%a6/
 
Last edited:
  • #37
I'm friends with Paul the guy who started that thread (braaap). We have both talked on this subject. I also have posted on that thread. I am part of that forum. That is far from new to me.

So what is the shorter vs longer primary going to do to the power curve? Anyone?
 
  • #38
That was covered in headers 101 during freshman year.
 
  • #39
HowlerMonkey said:
That was covered in headers 101 during freshman year.

... what?
 
  • #40
Long works better for lower rpm, shorter is for higher rpm. A reasonable length for street is in the 36 to 42 inch range depending on the application.

A longer tube will respond to higher rpm as well because of "overtones"; the resonance is not as strong though.
 
  • #41
Will them being that short compared to the 34 inches have a particularly negative affect though? As in on the dyno power?
 
  • #42
"Shorty headers" are a compromise for ease of installation.

They fall somewhere between stock manifolds and proper equal length headers.

Since I've been a Z car specialist for 25 years, what is the goal of this project?
 
  • #43
weekend road racer/street/show car I did three years of research before I bought an engine block, 6 months of research before I bought my heads, another 6 months of looking at every engine builder in MN before I chose a guy to do the heads and block.

I am well acquainted with what I am doing with this car and why I am doing it. The biggest challenge is lack of tire, and finding parts to meet exactly what I want, as many other things as well of course. I have been asked by hundreds of people the purpose of the car and been told hundreds of opinions. I couldn't care any less about opinions than I already do, I want exact facts.

I am using the stock r200 3.545 gear set, 245/50r16 tires on 16x8.25 inch rims. I measured the width of the rim they are actually 240mm in width so 245mm would be perfect. They are 320aa rated firestones. I have a deal with bridgestone/firestone that give me buy two get two. These are the only W rated tire I could find in the width I needed in a 16. Which makes sense seeing that it is an 80's IROC size tire. 1978 280z 5 speed donor car. I will be working with carbon fiber to for body work as soon as the engine is in. I am keeping the glass, I don't want to mess around with not being able to see. I am using 280z stub axles as well as the half shafts with the premium grade u-joints until I get the arizona z suspension kit. I will be using the toyota pickup upgrade for front brakes. For the rear brakes I will be trying to locate a kit for the 240sx brake swap. M and M are a pita to get a hold of I've tried for 6 months now. They can go to hell as far as I am concerned. I may make a bracket myself and sell it for half the price to the z guys just to spite of them.

This is also a car I will be keeping for the rest of my days so there will always be more. Eventually I will be making my own custom efi itb setup from a e92 m3 intake and itbs. Lots of projects for this car ahead.

Did you have something else to add?
 
  • #44
mender said:
Long works better for lower rpm, shorter is for higher rpm. A reasonable length for street is in the 36 to 42 inch range depending on the application.

A longer tube will respond to higher rpm as well because of "overtones"; the resonance is not as strong though.

Can you touch a little more on "resonance"?
 
  • #45
Think of resonance as pushing someone on a swing. If your timing, resonance, is in tune with their speed you can add to their speed (or maintain it) by pushing fairly lightly each time. If your resonance is out of tune with theirs you will either impede their movement or have to push harder to affect it (imagine pushing when they are almost at their peak outward moment). The problem with exhaust is that it's not as simple as a siphoning effect from the exhaust passing the other pipes at the collector. In reality, a pressure wave bounces up and down the pipes, and if you did everything correctly, it creates a low pressure in the pipe at just the right time. The problem with that is, the wave moves so fast that the first wave is not the one you can use (at least not on a vehicle - this is where the 'overtones' mender was referring to come in). Through resonance, the waves work together to create the pressure wave at the right time and aid in exhaust scavenging; but that's only part of the story... Collector length affects tuning also, as well as diameter. But, the rest of the exhaust has it's own resonance too, which can sometimes cause some unexpected, and irritating, noise from the exhaust at specific engine speeds.

Header programs generally ignore the rest of the exhaust system and normally the dynos don't have the entire exhaust system in place. For racing that's fine, but for street it's misleading. The shorty headers have a resonance to them, but it's like someone pushing the swing more often, so the swing has to swing faster to match the resonance. And, just to make it worse, once you pass peak torque the whole collector (and exhaust) is just getting in the way anyhow. Exhaust (and intake as well) is a very dynamic area with more R&D than you would ever think is required.
 
  • #46
Well I suppose that is the exact reason why I am here asking questions.

Also I have been told to make as short an exhaust as I possibly can, for basically the reason you just gave. If I can get the headers from an x pipe immediately to a muffler that takes the exhaust out the side immediately that is what I am after.

That tone from the shorty headers (sound of the exhaust created) is something I am after btw I don't know if you saw the videos I posted.
 
  • #47
faytmorgan said:
Did you have something else to add?


Sure, I'll bite.

Headers: If your piping diameter, length, and collector dimensions are not tuned for your desired rpm range, then all you have is headers that flow better than the stock setup.

Yes, your scavenging will increase with shorty headers over stock manifolding (not all) but the lack of tuning diminishes your returns.

The tipping point that made shorty headers popular is the ease of installation of shorties vs a much harder install for the true tuned long tube headers in the fox body mustang.

I would consider that the recipe of header length/diameter/collector...etc. for your desired rpm range has already been beat to death and is chronicled on many an internet site for sbc and that your issue will be either finding a vendor that has the product you need or building your own to fit your unibody.

If you want true 180 degree headers, I'm not sure where you would have room to pull this off and still be able to keep the length of the tubes optimum.

R200: I would recommend a 4 pinion carrier for it.

Engine: If you want 10.5 to 1 on pump gas, there had better be some quench in your setup or you will be compromising the power by having to pull too much timing.

I feel that the later iron vortec heads from the late LT1s, if found at a salvage yard, would be the best bang for the buck and would pick them even over the aluminum lt1 heads from the corvettes of the same year.

I saw 7 of them while contemplating the two Lincoln mk Viii 4 cam engines a couple of days ago.

If you've already cemented your engine, then continue on but beware high compression on older cylinder heads designed before what we know now because most lack the quench (read detonation resistence) you need to run that ratio.

Transmission: Hammering the tunnel or cutting material away will be needed for clearance of the transmision itself. You also might end up with having to relocate or modify the gas pedal linkage because it will also hit.

Distributor: You surely won't be getting optimum engine position with a Delco HEI distributor overhanging the transmission flange so that has to be considered...unless you run the horribly crappy optispark...which is a distributor mounted to the front of the engine...which fills with water or oil if you aren't on top of all leaks.

These are just a few things off the top of my head that you will have to address for success.

I would be glad to make you headers but my current backlog of aston martin header fab jobs dictates that I we would have to charge near 10k for them to put the aston stuff on the back burner.
 
Last edited:
  • #48
I can help you out with that: send a few of the Aston Martin guys up here and I'll fab headers for them!
 
  • #49
Where does one find said 4 pinion carrier? I have never seen them available for the r200.

The heads are aftermarket AFR nockoffs that are getting done up by Travis knowlton at Knowlton's thunderhead in bethel mn. So I am not worried a damn about quench. He think I can take it higher on compression but I am going to stay on the safe side of 10.5:1
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
30K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
36K