How Does Introducing a Second Magnetic Field Affect NMR and Quantum Behavior?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The introduction of a second magnetic field, denoted as B1, orthogonal to the primary field B0, alters the behavior of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) systems. The net magnetization vector M precesses around an effective magnetic field Beff = B0 + B1, suggesting a circular motion. At the quantum level, individual magnetic moments transition between spin states due to quantum Zeeman splitting, leading to a new Boltzmann equilibrium. This equilibrium results in a coherent precession of magnetic moments rather than a random distribution, resolving the apparent conflict in behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and magnetic fields
  • Familiarity with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) principles
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and spin systems
  • Awareness of Boltzmann equilibrium concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the quantum mechanics of two-state systems in NMR
  • Explore the effects of quantum Zeeman splitting on nuclear spins
  • Learn about the principles of RF resonance in NMR applications
  • Read "Principles of Nuclear Magnetism" by Slichter for in-depth understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and nuclear magnetic resonance, as well as professionals in fields utilizing NMR technology.

pmiranda
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am writing an appendix to my thesis where i try to explain how nmr works but i am having trouble understanding something.

Suppose that we have a sample with many nuclei with 1/2 spin precessing around an external magnetic field \vec{B_0} aligned with the z axis. At Boltzmann equilibrium the net magnetization \vec{M} of the sample would be along the positive direction of z.

Since the rate of change of individual magnetic moments is given by
\frac{d\vec\mu}{dt}=\gamma\vec\mu\times \vec{B_0}

the generalization to the net magnetization vector \vec{M} would be
\frac{d\vec{M}}{dt}=\gamma\vec{M}\times \vec{B_0}

suppose that we now introduce a constant, non oscillating, magnetic field \vec{B_1} orthogonally to \vec{B_0}. I guess it is safe to write that:
\frac{d\vec{M}}{dt}=\gamma\vec{M}\times (\vec{B_0}+\vec{B_1})=\gamma\vec{M}\times (\vec{B_{eff}})

This suggests that the magnetization vector would move in a circular path around \vec{B_{eff}}.

If everything i said until now is correct, i can't understand what happens at quantum level. I mean, although the macroscopic equation suggests that \vec{M} would precess around \vec{B_{eff}} what happens to the individual magnetic moments? I would think that a new Boltzmann equilibrium where they are randomly precessing around \vec{B_{eff}} would be establish, however, that implies that \vec{M} is static vector along that same direction!

I can't understand this conflict. There must be something wrong or something missing here. The only thing i can remember is that somehow the individual moments are no longer randomly distributed along the 2 cones but are now rotating in phase from where the excess of nuclei in the lower energy state would coincide with \vec{M} but how did that happen?


My formation is quantum physics is not that advanced since i graduated in informatics and this is really killing me. Can someone help me understand what happens to the individual magnetic moments as soon as the second magnetic field is introduced?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The QM view of NMR is different. The nuclear spins form a two-state system (spin aligned and anti-aligned with the field) that have an energy difference given by the quantum Zeeman splitting. Transitions between the states occur when a photon of correct energy (frequency) is absorbed or emitted--the quantum equivalent of the classical RF resonance condition.

There are many sites on the web that cover this, e.g.
http://users.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~stuart/thesis/chapter_2/section2_2.html

or see any NMR text. A classic is Slichter, Principles of Nuclear Magnetism.
 


see also below chapter one of below book:
"Basic one- and two-dimenstional NMR spectroscopy", Freibolian.
and for nmr below book is great:
"Spin Dynamics, Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance" - Malcolm H. Levitt - John Wiley.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K