How Does Length Extend to General Sets of Real Numbers?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Artusartos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Length Set
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of extending the notion of length to general sets of real numbers, particularly focusing on how length is defined for open sets and the implications of countable unions of intervals. Participants explore the definitions provided in their textbook and seek clarification on the meaning of countable intervals within open sets.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how a "countable number of open intervals" can exist within an open interval, using (0,2) as an example to illustrate their confusion.
  • Another participant asserts that regardless of how many intervals are created, the sum of their lengths will equal the length of the original segment, but expresses hesitation about the term "countable" implying an infinite number of intervals.
  • A different participant clarifies that any collection of non-overlapping open intervals is either finite or countably infinite, allowing for the addition of their lengths.
  • One participant reiterates the definition of length for an open interval and discusses how to determine the length of a union of intervals, providing examples such as (0, 1) ∪ (3, 10) and the implications for sets of rational and irrational numbers.
  • There is mention that not all sets can be expressed as countable unions of intervals, indicating that some sets may not have a defined length.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the concept of countable intervals and their implications for defining length. There is no consensus on the clarity of the definitions provided in the textbook, and multiple interpretations of the concept remain present.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the definitions and examples provided may not cover all possible sets, leading to uncertainty about how length can be generalized beyond intervals. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying the concept of length to more abstract sets.

Artusartos
Messages
236
Reaction score
0
Our textbook states "The length l(I) of an interval I is defined to be the difference of the endpoints of I if I is bounded, and infinity if I is unbounded. Lenght is an example of a set function, that is, a function that assosiates an extended real number to each set in a collection of sets. In the case of length, the domain is the collection of all intervals. In this chapter we extend the set function length to a large collection of sets fo real numbers. For instance, the "length" of an open set will be the sum of the lengths of the countable number of open intervals of which it is composed."

I don't understand this last sentence.

1) How can there be a "countable number of open intervals" in an open interval? For example, if we have (0,2), I can choose any two numbers x,y such that 0 < x,y <2 and create an open interval from them, right? So I don't understand what they mean by a "countable number of open intervals".

2) The text is telling us the the "'length' of an open set will be the sum of the lengths of the countable number of open intervals of which it is composed". But how can we know the length of those "countable number of open intervals of which it is composed.

I was wondering if anybody could give me an example in order to clarify what this means...

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but no matter which x and y we choose (and if we add in more variables, such as w and z,) the sum of the lengths is going to be the same. If we take a line segment and chop it up into bits, the sum of the lengths of those bits is always going to be the length of the original segment.

Them using the word "countable" and saying that an open interval is composed of open intervals, however, makes me hesitate on this. I'm not too far into set theory, but countable makes it sound like they're talking about an infinite number of intervals.
 
The point of countable is that any collection of non-overlapping open intervals is finite or countably infinite, so you can add up the lengths.
 
Artusartos said:
Our textbook states "The length l(I) of an interval I is defined to be the difference of the endpoints of I if I is bounded, and infinity if I is unbounded. Lenght is an example of a set function, that is, a function that assosiates an extended real number to each set in a collection of sets. In the case of length, the domain is the collection of all intervals. In this chapter we extend the set function length to a large collection of sets fo real numbers. For instance, the "length" of an open set will be the sum of the lengths of the countable number of open intervals of which it is composed."

I don't understand this last sentence.

1) How can there be a "countable number of open intervals" in an open interval? For example, if we have (0,2), I can choose any two numbers x,y such that 0 < x,y <2 and create an open interval from them, right? So I don't understand what they mean by a "countable number of open intervals".
Your quote above does not say that- it does not say a "countable number of open intervals" in an open interval, it says a "countable number of open intervals" in an open set. So it is referring to finding the length of things like (0, 1)\cup (3, 10). That set would have length (1- 0)+ (10- 3). That is, it is building up general sets in terms of unions of intervals. (Not all sets can be written as countable unions of intervals so there will still be some sets for which we cannot define "length".)

2) The text is telling us the the "'length' of an open set will be the sum of the lengths of the countable number of open intervals of which it is composed". But how can we know the length of those "countable number of open intervals of which it is composed.
By using the definition given for the length of an open interval: the length of (a, b)= b- a. If you are asking how we can know those intervals, well that depends on exactly how the set itself is given. The point here was to generalize length from intervals to more general sets. For example, the "set of all rational numbers between 0 and 1" is itself countable and so can be written as a countable union of singleton sets- sets containing a single point. Such a set has length 0, of course, so the "set of all rational numbers between 0 and 1" has length 0. And, from that we see that, since the length of the interval (0, 1) is 1, the "set of all irrational numbers between 0 and 1" has length 1 as well.

But, as I said before there will always be sets that cannot be written that way and so have no "length".

I was wondering if anybody could give me an example in order to clarify what this means...

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Your quote above does not say that- it does not say a "countable number of open intervals" in an open interval, it says a "countable number of open intervals" in an open set. So it is referring to finding the length of things like (0, 1)\cup (3, 10). That set would have length (1- 0)+ (10- 3). That is, it is building up general sets in terms of unions of intervals. (Not all sets can be written as countable unions of intervals so there will still be some sets for which we cannot define "length".)


By using the definition given for the length of an open interval: the length of (a, b)= b- a. If you are asking how we can know those intervals, well that depends on exactly how the set itself is given. The point here was to generalize length from intervals to more general sets. For example, the "set of all rational numbers between 0 and 1" is itself countable and so can be written as a countable union of singleton sets- sets containing a single point. Such a set has length 0, of course, so the "set of all rational numbers between 0 and 1" has length 0. And, from that we see that, since the length of the interval (0, 1) is 1, the "set of all irrational numbers between 0 and 1" has length 1 as well.

But, as I said before there will always be sets that cannot be written that way and so have no "length".

Thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K