How Does Lipschitz Continuity Constrain a Function's Graph Between Two Lines?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 4K views
Azael
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
Let the function
[tex]f:[0,\infty) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/tex] be lipschitz continuous with lipschits constant K. Show that over small intervalls [tex][a,b] \subset [0,\infty)[/tex] the graph has to lie between two straight lines with the slopes k and -k.

This is how I have started:

Definition of lipschits continuity [tex]|f(x)-f(y)| \leq k|x-y|[/tex]

[tex]b>a[/tex]
[tex]|f(b)-f(a)| \leq k(b-a) \Leftrightarrow -k(b-a) \leq f(b)-f(a) \leq k(b-a)[/tex]

But after this I am a bit stumped. I don't know how to continue
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it enough to just divide all sides with (b-a) to show that the slope of the grap is always less than K and more than -K?? To me it feels like it but I don't know if that is proof enough??
 
like this??

continuing from the last step of post one

=>
[tex]-k(x-a) \leq f(x)-f(a) \leq k(x-a)[/tex] with [tex]a \leq x \leq b[/tex]
<=>
[tex]f(a)-k(x-a) \leq f(x) \leq k(x-a)+f(a)[/tex]

thanks a lot!
that seems to have solved it :)
 
Last edited:
If I want to show the same thing for a local lipschitz continuous function(that it lies between two straight lines with slope K(a,b) and -K(a,b) where K can be different for different intervalls) how do I proced. It is exactly the same as above but with K replaced with K(a,b) in all places?

so that I instead get as last line
[tex]f(a)-K(a,x)(x-a) \leq f(x) \leq f(a)+K(a,x)(x-a)[/tex]
 
Last edited: