How does mars have a magnetic field, with a cooled core?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of magnetic fields on planets, particularly Mars, and the implications of planetary cores and atmospheres in relation to their proximity to stars. Participants explore the conditions under which planets can maintain atmospheres and magnetic fields, addressing both theoretical and observational aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that for a planet to be cool and close to a star, it would require a thick atmosphere and a strong magnetic field to protect it from solar winds.
  • Others argue that Mercury's weak magnetic field contributes to its inability to retain a thick atmosphere, despite its proximity to the Sun.
  • There is a suggestion that Mars has local magnetic fields but lacks a significant global magnetic field, indicating it may have once had a stronger magnetic field that has since weakened.
  • Some participants speculate that local magnetic fields on Mars could arise from minerals that become permanent magnets over time.
  • Concerns are raised about the mechanisms by which Venus retains its atmosphere despite having a weak magnetic field, with some suggesting that the interaction between solar wind and atmosphere may play a role.
  • Participants discuss the complexities of magnetic field generation, noting that temperature effects on magnetism may not apply uniformly across different planetary bodies.
  • There is mention of the Moon and its weak magnetic field, suggesting that even with a molten outer core, not all planets generate substantial magnetic fields.
  • Some participants highlight the ongoing mystery surrounding the Earth's magnetic field and its persistence over geological timescales, questioning existing dynamo theories.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanisms behind magnetic field generation and atmospheric retention on planets. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the specific reasons for Mars' magnetic field or the atmospheric conditions of Mercury and Venus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in understanding the exact processes that govern magnetic field generation, the role of temperature in magnetism, and the complexities involved in atmospheric retention, particularly in relation to solar wind interactions.

Ethan Howell
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have been studying astronomy and astrophysics for about 2 years now, though on my own time and by my self. A recent question came into my mind, Can arctic planets exist close to their star? Now, in my understanding of planetary science, in order for a planet to be cool and close to the sun, it would need a pretty thick atmosphere, and a strong magnetic field in order to protect that atmosphere from the star's solar winds. Instantly, mercury came to mind, so I tried to find out why mercury doesn't have a thick atmosphere, and came out understanding that mercury's magnetic field is not very strong, and the sun's solar winds blow away it's atmosphere, but the magnetic field does protect it from some solar winds. I can understand why mercury has a weak magnetic field, because it is the smallest planet and has the least mass. So I directed my study to the cores of other planets, I know venus's magnetic field is significantly weaker than earth's, because the effect of magnets weakens the hotter it gets, and on venus, where it is hot enough to melt lead, it would have a pretty weak magnetic field. I just can't understand how it holds onto it's atmosphere, with strong solar winds and a weak magnetic field. To make matters worse, I tried to find out why Mars still has a magnetic field. I was taught that a magnetic field generates when a planet has a solid inner core and a liquid outer core, because the flow of liquid iron creates a magnetic field. Mar's core has been cooled since the creation of our solar system, but yet it still generates a magnetic field, though being geologically inactive. How? Though the title only holds one of the questions I had, may you answer the ones I couldn't fit in the title?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mars doesn't have a significant global magnetic field, there are local areas with magnetic fields but they're not organised in a systematic way.
It probably means that Mars did once have a substantial global magnetic field which produced these local magnetic areas, but the global field is no longer being generated, or as at least it has much weakened.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ethan Howell
rootone said:
Mars doesn't have a significant global magnetic field, there are local areas with magnetic fields but they're not organised in a systematic way.
It probably means that Mars did once have a global magnetic field which produced these local magnetic areas, but the global field is no longer being generated,
I understand that, but what I am having trouble grasping is how those local areas are still being generated.
 
The best idea I have heard of is that they may be areas where some minerals exist which can naturally turn into permanent magnets given enough time.
Like lodestone on Earth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lodestone
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ethan Howell
Ethan Howell said:
in order for a planet to be cool and close to the sun, it would need a pretty thick atmosphere
Are you sure? At least the atmospheres in our solar system increase the temperature, and they always lead to more uniform temperatures.
Ethan Howell said:
mercury came to mind, so I tried to find out why mercury doesn't have a thick atmosphere
That's reversing the logic.
Ethan Howell said:
because the effect of magnets weakens the hotter it gets, and on venus, where it is hot enough to melt lead, it would have a pretty weak magnetic field.
The magnetism of Venus and Earth is not driven by permanent magnets that would lose their field by heating, and the temperature on the surface is irrelevant because the field is produced much deeper down.

How Venus keeps its atmosphere is still an open question, and the answer is probably complex, involving magnetic fields induced by the interaction of solar wind and atmosphere, and similar things.
Ethan Howell said:
I tried to find out why Mars still has a magnetic field.
Uh well, it is extremely weak. Moon still has some field as well, mainly locally from remaining magnetized material in it.
 
mfb said:
Are you sure? At least the atmospheres in our solar system increase the temperature, and they always lead to more uniform temperatures.That's reversing the logic.The magnetism of Venus and Earth is not driven by permanent magnets that would lose their field by heating, and the temperature on the surface is irrelevant because the field is produced much deeper down.

How Venus keeps its atmosphere is still an open question, and the answer is probably complex, involving magnetic fields induced by the interaction of solar wind and atmosphere, and similar things.Uh well, it is extremely weak. Moon still has some field as well, mainly locally from remaining magnetized material in it.
The reason why I chose to find out why mercury doesn't have a thick atmosphere is because it is close to the sun, and still has a molten outer core. Therefore it should have a significant magnetic sphere, should it not? The answer to my initial question does lie with mercury. Why mercury doesn't have a large atmosphere is simply because it's magnetic sphere is not strong enough to hold onto the atmosphere with the strong solar winds. Also, under the right conditions, I think that a planet close to it's star could be cold. It would have to have an atmosphere that does not absorb much heat.
 
rootone said:
The best idea I have heard of is that they may be areas where some minerals exist which can naturally turn into permanent magnets given enough time.
Like lodestone on Earth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lodestone
That makes sense, thanks!
 
Ethan Howell said:
I know venus's magnetic field is significantly weaker than earth's, because the effect of magnets weakens the hotter it gets, and on venus, where it is hot enough to melt lead, it would have a pretty weak magnetic field.?

It doesn't work that way. The Sun has a strong magnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Mercury is simply too hot and too small to hold an atmosphere over longer timescales. Even with a magnetic field it would have lost any initial atmosphere by now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #11
Ethan Howell said:
The reason why I chose to find out why mercury doesn't have a thick atmosphere is because it is close to the sun, and still has a molten outer core. Therefore it should have a significant magnetic sphere, should it not? The answer to my initial question does lie with mercury.
Venus, Mars, and the Moon all have a molten outer cores, yet none has a substantial internally-generated magnetic field. Mercury does have a global magnetic field, but it's rather puny compared to that of the Earth. We still don't quite know why the Earth's magnetic field is so old (over 4 billion years old) and so persistent. While dynamo theory goes a long way, the numbers just don't seem to add up. At least one of a ridiculously high heat flux across the core-mantle boundary, a ridiculously hot early Earth, or a ridiculously young inner core is needed.

A very recently published paper, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/D_Andrault/publication/299551629_The_deep_Earth_may_not_be_cooling_down/links/57022d5708ae1408e15eb144.pdf , proposes an interesting solution: The Moon. But it's too early to tell whether this too fails to explain the mystery of the Earth's rather unique magnetic field.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
27K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K