How Does Matrix Exponentiation Retrieve Rotation Matrices?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gentsagree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the retrieval of finite rotation matrices through the exponentiation of their infinitesimal counterparts. Participants explore the series expansion of the matrix exponential and its implications for deriving trigonometric functions like cosine and sine.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the matrix exponential can be expressed as \(\exp(\omega) = \sum_{k=0}\frac{\omega^{2k}}{2k!}+\sum_{k=0}\frac{\omega^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}\), questioning the treatment of the identity matrix in the series.
  • Another participant agrees with the first claim but suggests that the second sum should start from \(k = 0\), implying a potential typo in the notes being referenced.
  • A third participant clarifies that the "linear term in \(\omega\)" corresponds to the term \(\frac{\omega^{2(0)+1}}{(2(0)+1)!} = \omega\), indicating that it is indeed present in the series expansion.
  • Another participant reiterates the typo point and adds that the characteristic equation of the matrix \(\omega\) can be used to simplify the expression by eliminating higher powers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there is a typo in the series expansion presented in the notes. However, there is some disagreement regarding the treatment of the linear term in \(\omega\) and its placement within the series.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the proper treatment of the identity matrix in the series expansion and the implications for deriving trigonometric functions. There is also mention of the characteristic equation as a method for simplifying the matrix powers.

gentsagree
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
I need to retrieve a finite rotation matrix (with cos and sin) from the exponentiation of the infinitesimal version of it.

Suppose my infinitesimal matrix is ω. I then compute exp(ω).

My guess would be

[tex]\exp(\omega)=\sum_{k=0}\frac{\omega^{2k}}{2k!}+\sum_{k=0}\frac{\omega^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

i.e. the even and odd contributions.

The notes I'm reading suggest instead:

[tex]\exp(\omega)=I+\sum_{k=1}\frac{\omega^{2k}}{2k!}+\sum_{k=1}\frac{\omega^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

which looks weird to me; if I take the identity matrix I to be the k=0 contribution of the even part (ω^0=1), then I don't know where the term linear in ω is in the series any more. I think it's not there at all.

Even more: I do need the k=0 contributions later on to retrieve the series expansion expressions for cos and sin.

What do you think? Any comments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree. Replacing the ##\omega^0/0!## term by ##I## is fair enough, but the second sum should be from ##k = 0##.

It's probably just a typo.
 
?? The "linear term in [itex]\omega[/itex]" is the term with [itex]\omega^1[/itex] which means it is the term in the second sum with k= 0: [itex]\frac{\omega^{2(0)+ 1}}{(2(0)+ 1)!}= \omega[/itex].

The linear approximation to [itex]e^\omega[/itex] is [itex]I+ \omega[/itex].
 
I agree. It's a typo. If you are doing this, don't forget that you can use the characteristic equation of the matrix ω to eliminate all the high powers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K