How Does McDonald's Calculate Its Weighted Average Cash for ROIIC?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter viciam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how McDonald's calculates its weighted average cash for Returns on Incremental Invested Capital (ROIIC), particularly focusing on the methodology behind the figures presented in their annual report. Participants explore the implications of exchange rates and the quarterly weighting of cash used for investing activities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on how McDonald's arrived at the weighted average cash figure of $6,889.1, referencing a lack of visibility for a crucial screenshot.
  • Another participant suggests that the weighting might relate to variable exchange rates, proposing that cash spent in each quarter is used as weight rather than a simple average.
  • A different participant expresses doubt about the sufficiency of the provided data to verify the calculations.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the relationship between annual amounts and quarterly weights, with one participant noting that the annual figures do not clearly indicate how cash is split between quarters.
  • One participant provides a detailed explanation of ROIIC, emphasizing the importance of quarterly weightings in reflecting the contribution of each quarter’s investing activities to operating income.
  • Another participant questions how the average can exceed individual adjusted cash numbers, suggesting a potential misunderstanding of the calculation process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculation methodology and the implications of exchange rates, indicating that multiple competing interpretations exist without a clear consensus on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the available data, particularly regarding the lack of clarity on how cash amounts are distributed across quarters and the assumptions made in the calculations.

viciam
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I am doing some research into McDonalds and it's international businesses. It's a small study for people who are interested in good company structures.

I came across a section in their annual report where they give some weighted average figures but I don't know how they arrived at those figures and I'm not very good at maths, so I was hoping someone might know the answer to my question.

$6,889.1 is the weighted average cash... how did they arrive at this figure using the numbers in the screen shot below? :S

In the notes it says: " The denominator is the weighted average cash used for investing activities during the applicable one or three year period. The weighted average cash used for investing activities is based on a weighting applied on a quarterly basis.

Here is a screenshot of what I am looking at: (if the screenshot isn't visible please see it as http://postimg.org/image/de0tttj71/ )

http://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=55635&d=1385913667

Thank you in advance, sorry if its a dumb question,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no screenshot visible. If you see it: maybe you have to be registered there to see it.
 
Here is the link for the screenshot

http://postimg.org/image/de0tttj71/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The weighting could be related to the variable exchange rates. Instead of averaging the exchange rate over all quarters, the cash spent in that quarter is used as weight. That is a more complicated way to say "in each quarter, the money is converted according to the exchange rate at that point" (maybe even with smaller steps than quarters).
 
I know this is going to be asking too much but any chance of providing a calculation? Is it possible to do the calculation using the information that's shown on that screenshot?
 
If my guess is right, the data there is not sufficient to check the numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Based on the footnote (3) and (4) it sounds like the weighted average is not related to currency changes, they just assumed a flat exchange rate by averaging the exchange rate over the whole period.

It sounds like the weights in the average are supposed to be the percents at the bottom of the page, but I don't understand how they are averaging the adjusted cash and coming up with a number larger than any of the individual adjusted cash numbers.

If I didn't know this gave the wrong number I would think the calcuation they are doing is
[tex]\frac{3167.3*(.875+.625+.375+.125) + 2570.9*4 + 2056*4 + 1655.3*(.875+.625+.375+.125) }{8+2*(.875+.625+.375+.125)}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
The problem is that the 3167.3 and so on seem to be amounts per year whereas the weights are per quarter. But they don't show how the money is split between quarters.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hi guys,

Thanks for actually giving this some thought. I just found this in the annual report and it has to do with the original question.

RECONCILIATION OF RETURNS ON INCREMENTAL INVESTED CAPITAL

ROIIC is a measure reviewed by management over one-year and three-year time periods to evaluate the overall profitability of the business units, the effectiveness of capital deployed and the future allocation of capital. This measure is calculated using operating income and constant foreign exchange rates to exclude the impact of foreign currency translation. The numerator is the Company’s incremental operating income plus depreciation and amortization from the base period. The denominator is the weighted-average cash used for investing activities during the applicable one-or three-year period. The weighted-average cash used for investing activities is based on a weighting applied on a quarterly basis. These weightings are used to reflect the estimated contribution of each quarter’s investing activities to incremental operating income. For example, fourth quarter 2012 investing activities are weighted less because the assets purchased have only recently been deployed and would have generated little incremental operating income (12.5% of fourth quarter 2012 investing activities are included in the one-year and three-year calculations). In contrast, fourth quarter 2011 is heavily weighted because the assets purchased were deployed more than 12 months ago, and therefore have a full-year impact on 2012 operating income, with little or no impact to the base period (87.5% and 100.0% of fourth quarter 2011
investing activities are included in the one-year and three-year calculations, respectively). Management believes that weighting cash used for investing activities provides a more accurate reflection of the relationship between its investments and returns than a simple average.
The reconciliations to the most comparable measurements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.,for the numerator and denominator of the one-year and three-year ROIIC are as follows:
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
17K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
33
Views
19K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K