How Does Sampling Strategy Impact Measurement Accuracy in Statistics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fog37
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurement Statistics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the impact of sampling strategy on measurement accuracy in statistics, specifically comparing a single sample of 100 measurements versus ten samples of 10 measurements each. Both approaches yield the same total number of measurements, but the statistical analysis reveals that the standard deviation remains consistent across both methods. The Central Limit Theorem is highlighted as a crucial concept, indicating that the distribution of sample means approaches a normal distribution as sample size increases. This understanding allows for definitive statements regarding the probability of deviation from the actual physical value being measured.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of standard deviation and variance in statistics
  • Familiarity with the Central Limit Theorem
  • Knowledge of sampling distributions
  • Ability to calculate mean and standard deviation from data sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Central Limit Theorem in detail
  • Explore the concept of sampling distributions and their applications
  • Learn about the implications of variance in multiple sampling strategies
  • Investigate advanced statistical methods for measuring uncertainty
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data analysts, researchers in measurement science, and anyone involved in experimental design and data collection methodologies.

fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello Forum,

I am taking a lab and we are learning about measurement and uncertainty. Suppose we have to measure the length L of an object. Once the data has been collected we can calculate the mean (average) and the standard deviation s. The resulting measurement would be expressed as [ mean +- s/sqrt(N)] unit where N is the number of collected measurements.

In statistics, there is the practice to collect multiple samples and obtain statistics from the sampling distribution. But this approach does not seem to apply in in the context of measuring a physical variable. Why?
Would it be better, from a statistical standpoint, to collect a single sample of N=100 measurements or M=10 samples each containing N=10 measurements? On both cases the total number of measurements is 100...

Thanks,
fog37
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not 100% sure I understand what you're asking but here goes...

In statistics it may be helpful to consider multiple samples to better understand the sampling distribution but as you say the N=100 once vs Ten cases of N=10 are equivalent amounts of data. The rule in statistics is that when we add independent random variables we add their variances (square of the standard deviation). Thus when we average (1/N*sum) we get for the composite standard deviation the S_{mean} = \frac{S}{\sqrt{N}}.

Consider then your N=100 vs Ten N=10 cases. Assuming the sample standard deviations for each sample are about equal and close to the pop. stdev we would average the averages to get:
S_{Mean} = \frac{ \frac{S}{ \sqrt{10}} }{\sqrt{10}} = \frac{S}{\sqrt{10}\cdot \sqrt{10}}= \frac{S}{\sqrt{100}}
so the standard deviation calculation is the same.
[There's additional stat analysis we could do with the variations in the sample standard deviations but it should all balance out as your intuition would suggest since fundamentally what it's telling you is correct, this partitioning of the sample doesn't change the information it contains.]

As you move deeper into the probability theory for the sampling distribution you'll note the Central Limit Theorem applies an you can describe the shape of the distribution for the sample mean you use for your measurement. (that it has the normal distribution with its bell shaped density curve).

What may be confusing you is that to talk about the sampling distribution of your mean measurement, one must speak of how it behaves under many samplings. One is abstracting the random experiment of measuring the system one level higher to the random experiment of measuring N systems and calculating a mean value. To describe this second random experiment we need a (meta)sample i.e. many N-measurement samples. Once we consider this then we can describe the aggregate behavior of such samples and thus make definitive statements about the probability that your mean value deviates a certain amount from the actual physical value it seeks to measure.

This is where the S/sqrt(N) formula comes from... in particular:
\sigma_{\overline{X}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sigma_X
where \overline{X} is the mean value of N independent random variables each with standard deviation \sigma_X.

One is here describing how the mean value behaves over many samples in terms of how the original variable behaves over a single sample.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K