How does the amplitude on a EM wave graph correspond to the number of photons?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationship between amplitude and photon number in electromagnetic (EM) waves is defined by the equation N ∼ E², where N represents the average number of photons and E denotes the magnitude of the electric field. The intensity of light, which is proportional to the energy flow, can be expressed as I ∼ c N h f, where c is the speed of light and h is Planck's constant. This establishes a direct correlation between the amplitude of the electric field and the number of photons in a coherent state, clarifying the connection between these concepts in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of Planck's constant (h) and its significance
  • Basic grasp of the photoelectric effect
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of coherent states in quantum mechanics
  • Study the derivation of the intensity of electromagnetic waves
  • Explore the relationship between energy, frequency, and intensity in light
  • Learn about the implications of the photoelectric effect in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in quantum mechanics, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between amplitude and photon number in electromagnetic waves.

curiousatlarg
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello all! I am trying to understand ER on a more intuitive level. I can see the relationship between energy and frequency. The relationship between amplitude and photon number is less clear. So far I have E = hf. I understand that the intensity of light is a function of the number of photons. Can this be correlated to amplitude? If so, then how? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What amplitude are you referring to?
 
curiousatlarg,

I assume by amplitude you mean the magnitude of the electric field, let's call it E. In fact, E is related to the average number of photons via N \sim E^2. Please note also the very important word average. A macroscopic electric field does not correspond to an exact number of photons but instead to something called a coherent state of photons (we can discuss this later if you want).

My claim above can be understood as follows. Let's think about a EM wave of fixed frequency. If you accept that the energy of one photon is h f then the energy of N photons is N h f and the rate of energy flow, which is proportional to the intensity, is I \sim c N h f (c is the speed of light i.e. how fast the photons are going). Now you also know that the intensity is given by I \sim E^2 in a classical EM wave, so by equating these two forms you find that E^2 \sim N up to lots of factors that you can work out or look up somewhere.

Hope this helps.
 
Thanks. I was referring to both the electric and the magnetic fields. What you gave me so far is what I was looking for. I will work with it some.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
10K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
767
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K