How Does the Born Series Expansion Translate to Spatial Representation?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
PineApple2
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hello. I read about the born series in scattering,
[tex] |\psi> = (1+G_0V+\ldots)|\psi_0> [/tex]
Now when I want to move to spatial representation, the textbook asserts I should get
[tex] \psi(\vec{r})=\psi_0(\vec{r}) + \int dV' G_0(\vec{r},\vec{r'}) V(\vec{r'})\psi_0(\vec{r'})+\ldots[/tex]
by operating with [itex]<\vec{r}|[/itex] from the left. However I don't know how to get the 2nd term (the integral). I tried to insert a complete basis like this:
[tex] <\vec{r}|G_0V|\psi_0> = \int d^3r'<\vec{r}|G_0|\vec{r'}><\vec{r'}|V|\psi_0>[/tex]
however I don't know how to get [itex]V(\vec{r'})[/itex] from the second bracketed term. Any help?

By the way: is there a "nicer" way to write 'bra' and 'ket' in this forum?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Introduce another unit operator in terms of the completeness relation for the position-eigenbasis. Then you use

[tex]\langle \vec{x}' |V(\hat{\vec{x}}\vec{x}'' \rangle = V(\vec{x}'') \langle \vec{x}'| \vec{x}'' \rangle=V(\vec{x}') \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}'-\vec{x}'').[/tex]

Then one of the integrals from the completeness relations can be used to get rid of the [itex]\delta[/itex] distribution, and you arrive at Born's series in the position representation as given by your textbook.
 
I see. And then [itex]V(\vec{x'})[/itex] can be taken out as [itex]|\vec{x'}>[/itex] are its eigenstates and it is taken out as a scalar.
Thanks!