How does the determinant of the metric transform

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 4K views
Milsomonk
Messages
100
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


In special relativity the metric is invariant under lorentz transformations and therefore so is the determinant of the metric. How does the metric determinant transform under a more general transformation $$x^{a\prime}=J^{a\prime}_{\quad a}x^{a}$$ where $$J^{a\prime}_{\quad a}$$ may not satisfy the conditions of the lorentz group.

Homework Equations


$$x^{a\prime}=J^{a\prime}_{\quad a}x^{a}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So I need to show how the determinant transforms, but in general I thought that the determinant was a scalar and thus did not transform, clearly this isn't correct so my next thought was to perform the above transformation on the metric as follows:
$$\eta_{a^{\prime}b^{\prime}}=J_{a\prime}^{\quad a}J_{b\prime}^{\quad b}\eta_{ab}$$
Then take the determinant of the result. But this doesn't appear to get me anywhere and doesn't make use of the fact that J is in general not a lorentz transform, any guidance as to where I should go next or whether I'm barking up the wrong tree entirely would be much appreciated :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Douglas Sunday
Physics news on Phys.org
Milsomonk said:
but in general I thought that the determinant was a scalar and thus did not transform
The metric determinant is not a scalar, but a scalar density of weight ##\pm 2## (with sign depending on weight convention). You should be able to show this by expressing the metric determinant in terms of the permutation symbols and the metric. (Note that the permutation symbols are tensor densities.)
 
Aha I'll give that a go, thanks very much :)