How does the determinant of the metric transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The determinant of the metric in special relativity is not a scalar but a scalar density of weight ±2, which depends on the weight convention used. This conclusion arises from the transformation of the metric under general transformations represented by $$x^{a\prime}=J^{a\prime}_{\quad a}x^{a}$$, where $$J^{a\prime}_{\quad a}$$ does not necessarily conform to Lorentz transformation conditions. To demonstrate this, one can express the metric determinant using permutation symbols and the metric itself, as permutation symbols are tensor densities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with metric tensors and their properties
  • Knowledge of tensor densities and their significance
  • Basic grasp of permutation symbols in tensor calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of scalar densities in tensor analysis
  • Learn about the role of permutation symbols in defining tensor densities
  • Explore the implications of metric transformations in general relativity
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of Lorentz transformations versus general transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on special relativity, tensor calculus, and the mathematical foundations of physics.

Milsomonk
Messages
100
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


In special relativity the metric is invariant under lorentz transformations and therefore so is the determinant of the metric. How does the metric determinant transform under a more general transformation $$x^{a\prime}=J^{a\prime}_{\quad a}x^{a}$$ where $$J^{a\prime}_{\quad a}$$ may not satisfy the conditions of the lorentz group.

Homework Equations


$$x^{a\prime}=J^{a\prime}_{\quad a}x^{a}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So I need to show how the determinant transforms, but in general I thought that the determinant was a scalar and thus did not transform, clearly this isn't correct so my next thought was to perform the above transformation on the metric as follows:
$$\eta_{a^{\prime}b^{\prime}}=J_{a\prime}^{\quad a}J_{b\prime}^{\quad b}\eta_{ab}$$
Then take the determinant of the result. But this doesn't appear to get me anywhere and doesn't make use of the fact that J is in general not a lorentz transform, any guidance as to where I should go next or whether I'm barking up the wrong tree entirely would be much appreciated :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Douglas Sunday
Physics news on Phys.org
Milsomonk said:
but in general I thought that the determinant was a scalar and thus did not transform
The metric determinant is not a scalar, but a scalar density of weight ##\pm 2## (with sign depending on weight convention). You should be able to show this by expressing the metric determinant in terms of the permutation symbols and the metric. (Note that the permutation symbols are tensor densities.)
 
Aha I'll give that a go, thanks very much :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K