How Does the Expectation of a Normal Variable Derivation Work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the expectation of a normal variable, focusing on the integration steps involved in the proof and the manipulation of terms within the integral. Participants explore the mathematical reasoning behind separating terms in the integration process.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a proof for the expectation of a normal variable and expresses confusion about the separation of terms in the integral.
  • Another participant suggests that integration can be distributed over summation, implying that the integration can be applied to each term separately.
  • A follow-up response questions whether the constant term in front of the integrals should appear in both integrals or just the first one, indicating a lack of clarity on this point.
  • One participant references a basic algebraic principle to illustrate the distribution of multiplication over addition, but this does not resolve the confusion for others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the treatment of the constant term in the integrals or the separation of terms, indicating ongoing confusion and differing interpretations of the integration process.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the application of integration rules and the handling of constants in the context of the proof, which may depend on the specific definitions and assumptions made in the derivation.

rwinston
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi

More of a general integration question, but I just saw the following proof for the derivation of the expectation of a normal variable:

<br /> E[X] = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{x exp\left( -\frac{1}{2\sigma^2}(x-\mu)^2 \right) dx} <br />Set z=(x-mu):

<br /> E[X] = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{z exp\left( -\frac{1}{2\sigma^2}z^2 \right) dx} + \mu \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{exp\left( -\frac{1}{2\sigma^2}z^2 \right)dx}<br />

=\mu

Now, I don't really understand how this works: if z=x-mu, then I would assume that the term inside the integral becomes:

<br /> (z+\mu) exp\left( -\frac{1}{2\sigma^2}z^2\right)<br />

<br /> = z \left( exp\left( -\frac{1}{2\sigma^2}z^2 \right) \right) + \mu \left( exp\left( -\frac{1}{2\sigma^2}z^2 \right) \right)<br />

However, I don't see how we get two separate integrals, as in the proof above. Can anyone help shed any light on this?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a sum of two terms which need to be integrated, so you can distribute the integration over the summation?
 
genneth said:
It's a sum of two terms which need to be integrated, so you can distribute the integration over the summation?

Hmm...I'm still a bit confused tho - I know that you can distribute integration as you have said, as it is a linear operation, but if this was the case, would you have the

<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}<br />

term in front of both integrals? I would have thought it was just be in front of the first one?
 
a(b+c) = ab+ac

you learned that in kindergarten (albeit not in such an algebraic form).
 
Got it, thanks :-)

matt grime said:
a(b+c) = ab+ac

you learned that in kindergarten (albeit not in such an algebraic form).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K