How Does the Power Set Size Double with Each Additional Element?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the power set P([n]) of the set of the first n natural numbers has exactly 2^n elements, using mathematical induction. The original poster attempts to understand the inductive step, particularly how to demonstrate that P([n+1]) has twice as many elements as P([n]).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the base case and the inductive step, with the original poster expressing uncertainty about proving the relationship between P([n]) and P([n+1]). Some participants suggest a simpler understanding of subsets, while others question how to formally apply this reasoning to the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the inductive step. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between subsets in P(n) and P(n+1), but no consensus has been reached on how to formally prove the assertion.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a typo in the original post regarding the assumption for the inductive step, which may affect clarity in the discussion. Additionally, participants are considering the implications of their reasoning and whether they are conjecturing or proving their points.

Samuelb88
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let [n] denote the set consisting of the first n natural numbers 1, 2, 3, ..., n. Use induction to prove that the power set P([n]) has exactly 2^n elements.

The Attempt at a Solution



1) Base case: P([1]) = {{1}, null}. 2^1 = 2 elements.
2) Inductive step: Assume P([n]) has 2^n elements and prove P([n+1]) has 2^(n+1) elements.

I am stuck on the inductive step. I am not sure how to prove P([n+1]) has twice as many elements as P([n]). Through numerical experimentation for some small values of n, I've found that the number of new subset elements for each value of n is can be "represented" by pascal's triangle so I tried expressing the numbers of elements for P([n]) as a sum of the binomial coefficients:

[tex]2^n = \sum_{j=1}^{n} \frac{n(n-1)...(n-j+1)}{j!}\right)[/tex]

And by multiplying both sides by 2 would yield 2^(n+1) on the LHS, however, I can't seem to equate the RHS to:

[tex]\sum_{j=1}^{n+1} \frac{(n+1)(n)(n-1)...(n-j+2)}{j!}\right)[/tex]

Am I on the right track? Does this idea work? Any hints would be great! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are making this too complicated. P(n) is all of the subsets of {1,...,n}. P(n+1) is all of the subsets of {1,...,n,n+1}. For every subset in P(n) you can make 2 subsets of P(n+1) by either including the element n+1 or not.
 
Right, that makes sense. But how can I apply that idea to my inductive step?
 
Samuelb88 said:
Right, that makes sense. But how can I apply that idea to my inductive step?

Ok, then the number of elements in P(n+1) is twice the number of elements in P(n), isn't it?
 
Correct. But that seems like I am merely "conjecturing" that P(n+1) has twice as many elements as P(n), not proving.

PS: Sorry, I made a typo in my original post. It use to read, "...assume P([n+1])..."

2) Inductive step: Assume P([n]) has 2^n elements and prove P([n+1]) has 2^(n+1) elements.
 
Samuelb88 said:
Correct. But that seems like I am merely "conjecturing" that P(n+1) has twice as many elements as P(n), not proving.

PS: Sorry, I made a typo in my original post. It use to read, "...assume P([n+1])..."
No, you are not "conjecturing" anything. Every set in P(n+1) either contains n+1 or it doesn't. If it doesn't contain n+1 then it is in P(n). How many such sets are there?

If it does contain n+ 1 then it is a union, [itex]\{n+1\}\cup A[/itex] where A does NOT include n+1. How many such sets are there?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K