How does the renormalization factor affect the propagator?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RedX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Propagator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of the renormalization factor \( Z_\phi \) on the propagator in \(\phi^4\) scalar theory as described in Kaku's book. The self-energy \(\Sigma(p^2)\) is expanded, leading to a full propagator expression that incorporates \( Z_\phi \). The key conclusion is that while \( Z_\phi \) can be absorbed into bare constants in the numerator, it cannot be ignored in the denominator, particularly when calculating higher-order loop corrections. The final expression demonstrates that the renormalization process requires careful handling of \( Z_\phi \) to ensure accurate results in quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, specifically \(\phi^4\) theory.
  • Familiarity with self-energy and propagator calculations in particle physics.
  • Knowledge of dimensional regularization and handling infinities in quantum calculations.
  • Experience with Feynman diagrams and their role in perturbative expansions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of self-energy in \(\phi^4\) theory using Feynman diagrams.
  • Learn about dimensional regularization and its application in quantum field theory.
  • Explore the concept of multiplicative renormalization and its implications in higher-order loop calculations.
  • Investigate the role of renormalization factors in other quantum field theories beyond \(\phi^4\) theory.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum field theory, and researchers focusing on renormalization techniques in particle physics.

RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
In Kaku's book, the self-energy in a [tex]\phi^4[/tex] scalar theory is expanded in a Taylor series as:

[tex]\Sigma(p^2)=\Sigma (m^2)+\Sigma'(m^2)(p^2-m^2)+\tilde_{\Sigma}(p^2)[/tex]

where [tex]\tilde_{\Sigma}(p^2)[/tex] is finite and m is arbitrary (but finite).

The full propagator is then:

[tex]i\Delta(p)=\frac{i}{p^2-m_{0}^2-\Sigma (m^2)-\Sigma'(m^2)(p^2-m^2)-\tilde_{\Sigma}(p^2)+i\epsilon}[/tex]

where m0 is the bare mass that's in the original Lagrangian. If we define [tex]m_{0}^2+\Sigma(m^2)=m^2[/tex], i.e., the infinite bare mass cancels a divergence in a self-energy term to give something finite, then:

[tex]i\Delta(p)=\frac{i}{(1-\Sigma'(m^2))(p^2-m^2)-\tilde_{\Sigma}(p^2)+i\epsilon}[/tex]

Here's what I don't understand. Kaku now factors out a [tex]Z_\phi=\frac{1}{1-\Sigma'(m^2)}[/tex] to get:

[tex]i\Delta(p)=\frac{iZ_\phi}{(p^2-m^2)-\Sigma_{1}(p^2)+i\epsilon}[/tex]

where [tex]\Sigma_{1}(p^2) =Z_\phi\tilde_{\Sigma}(p^2)[/tex]

The [tex]Z_\phi[/tex] in the numerator of the propagator can be absorbed by bare constants, but I'm not sure how the [tex]Z_\phi[/tex] in the denominator (through [tex]\Sigma_1(p^2)[/tex]) can be gotten rid of.

Kaku defines the renormalized propagator [tex]\tilde{\Delta}(p)[/tex] as:

[tex]\Delta(p)=Z_\phi \tilde{\Delta}(p)[/tex]

which gets rid of [tex]Z_\phi[/tex] in the numerator, but not the denominator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, I think I got it. With this expression:

[tex] i\Delta(p)=\frac{iZ_\phi}{(p^2-m^2)-Z_\phi\tilde_{\Sigma}(p^2)+i\epsilon}[/tex]

you don't renormalize by just absorbing the [tex]Z_\phi[/tex] in the numerator into bare constants. You first calculate [tex]Z_\phi[/tex]=(1+[tex]\alpha[/tex]*infinity+[tex]\alpha^2[/tex]*infinity^2+...) [where infinity represents some regulated infinity like [tex]\frac{1}{\epsilon}[/tex] in dimensional regularization, and [tex]\alpha[/tex] is a bare constant) by calculating [tex]\Sigma'(0)[/tex] using Feynman diagrams, and using the master formula: [tex]Z_\phi=\frac{1}{1-\Sigma'(m^2)}[/tex].

We know that [tex]\Sigma'(m^2)[/tex] is infinity, but we do the insane idea that [tex]\alpha*infinity[/tex] is actually small, so instead of [tex]Z_\phi[/tex] being small because it has infinity in the denominator, [tex]Z_\phi=\frac{1}{1-\Sigma'(m^2)}=1+\Sigma'(m^2)}+...[/tex]

because [tex]\Sigma'(m^2)[/tex]=[tex]\alpha[/tex]*infinity+[tex]\alpha^2[/tex]*infinity^2+... and the RHS is small by the logic above.

Anyways, that's how you get:

[tex]Z_\phi[/tex]=(1+[tex]\alpha[/tex]*infinity+[tex]\alpha^2[/tex]*infinity^2+...)

So we had the original expression:

[tex] <br /> i\Delta(p)=\frac{iZ_\phi}{(p^2-m^2)-Z_\phi\tilde_{\Sigma}(p^2)+i\epsilon}<br /> [/tex]

but now expand the Z in the denominator:

[tex]i\Delta(p)=\frac{iZ_\phi}{(p^2-m^2)-(1+\alpha*infinity+\alpha^2*infinity^2+...)\tilde_{\Sigma}(p^2)+i\epsilon}[/tex]

But now the infinity terms in the denominator are really small since they are multiplied by alpha:

[tex]i\Delta(p)=\frac{iZ_\phi[1+(\alpha*infinity+\alpha^2*infinity^2+...)/(p^2-m^2-\tilde_{\Sigma}(p^2))+...]}{p^2-m^2-\tilde_{\Sigma(p^2)}+i\epsilon}[/tex]

So now we get something that is multiplicatively renormalizeable, only instead of only Z being just absorbed into the bare constants, the entire numerator is absorbed.

I suspect that 1-loop calculations are insensitive to this extra step, but when calculating higher-order loops, the extra term in the numerator must be considered.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K