How does the strange and anti-up quark produce a W-boson in K-minus decay?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jouleand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the decay of the K-minus meson (K-) into a muon (μ-) and an anti-muon neutrino (νμ) via the production of a W-boson. Participants confirm that the Feynman diagram depicting the interaction between a strange quark and an anti-up quark is correct. The interaction involves weak eigenstates and the CKM matrix, which describes the coupling of quarks to W-bosons. The correct quark content of the K- meson is emphasized, clarifying that it consists of a strange quark and an anti-up quark.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and particle interactions
  • Familiarity with quark content and meson decay processes
  • Knowledge of the CKM matrix and weak eigenstates
  • Basic concepts of particle physics, specifically W-boson interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and interactions of W-bosons in particle physics
  • Learn about the CKM matrix and its implications for quark mixing
  • Explore Feynman diagram conventions and notation in particle interactions
  • Investigate the decay processes of other mesons and their quark compositions
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students studying quantum field theory, and anyone interested in the interactions of fundamental particles and meson decay processes.

Jouleand
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I am trying to draw Feynman diagrams for the following reaction:

K- → μ- + (νμ) (anti muon neutrino, not very skilled at typing symbols sorry).

And I have the strange quark and the anti-up quark colliding to produce the muon and anti-muon neutrino via a W- boson. I'm not sure if this is right but it seems to be the most logical way to draw the diagram, could someone please verify if I am using the correct feynman diagram and potentially explain how the strange and anti-up quark produce a W-boson?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1452.jpg
    IMG_1452.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 680
Physics news on Phys.org
@vanhees71: Huh? The diagram is correct.

This forum supports LaTeX, the neutrino can be written as ##\bar \nu_\mu#[/color]# —> ##\bar \nu_\mu##.
 
Jouleand said:
could someone please verify if I am using the correct feynman diagram
it's the correct diagram for this case.

Jouleand said:
potentially explain how the strange and anti-up quark produce a W-boson?
This question is vague. In the quark sector, W bosons don't interact with mass eigenstates but with weak eigenstates. One can choose the down type quarks (|q|=1/3) to write them in the weak eigenstates, d'_i (i identifies the generation), which are related to the mass eigenstates d_i with the CKM matrix elements d'_i = V^{CKM}_{ij} d_j . Eg the interaction of W with (u,d') in terms of quark mass eigenstates is u ( V^{CKM}_{ud} d + V^{CKM}_{us} s + V^{CKM}_{ub} b ) W . As a result of this you can have ud,us,ub interactions with W-bosons (of course the CKM matrix is an almost diagonal unitary matrix and so the further away in generations you look, the weaker the couplings get, something you can see as "CKM suppressed").
 
mfb said:
@vanhees71: Huh? The diagram is correct.

This forum supports LaTeX, the neutrino can be written as ##\bar \nu_\mu## —> ##\bar \nu_\mu##.
Perhaps, I misread the labels on the diagram, but a kaon doesn't consist of an s quark and an anti-neutrino!
 
I'm quite sure that is a "##\overline u##" at the lower left. The ##\nu## at the lower right is not round at the bottom.
 
Argh. Yes, then it's of course right. Sorry for the confusion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K