D0-> K+ K- Decay Suppression - A Puzzling Question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter milch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decay
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the suppression of the decay process $$D^0 \rightarrow K^+ K^-$$, exploring the underlying reasons for this phenomenon. Participants analyze the Feynman diagram and the role of quark couplings, particularly in the context of Cabibbo suppression, and compare it to other decay processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the decay $$D^0 \rightarrow K^+ K^-$$ is suppressed, noting that the Feynman diagram appears to support the process.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of Cabibbo suppression, explaining that the decay is less frequent compared to $$D^0 \rightarrow K^- \pi^+$$ due to the involvement of quarks from different generations.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the applicability of Cabibbo suppression, asking if it only applies to quark-quark decays or if it is relevant in other quark coupling scenarios as well.
  • One participant confirms that Cabibbo suppression applies to any coupling of W bosons with quarks from different generations, emphasizing that the suppression is more significant when the generations involved are 1,3 or 2,3.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the role of Cabibbo suppression in the decay process, but there is some uncertainty regarding its applicability and implications in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the nuances of how Cabibbo suppression quantitatively affects decay rates across different processes, nor does it clarify the specific mechanisms leading to the observed suppression in the decay to $$K^+ K^-$$.

milch
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey community!

Since a couple of hours I've been dealing with the question why the decay $$D^0 \rightarrow K^+ K^-$$ is suppressed.
If I draw the Feynman diagram for the first order decay, everything seems pretty alright as the charm quark can couple with a strange quark. The resulting W+ can then produce an up and anti-strange quark which gives above K mesons.
What piece am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
up and anti-strange are two different generations, there you get the Cabibbo suppression (compared to ##D^0 \rightarrow K^- \pi^+##).

It is not a rare decay. It's just not as frequent as the decay to ##K^- \pi^+##.
 
Aaah, somehow I thought the Cabibbo suppression just applies in case of a quark-quark decay. But it holds whenever any kind of quark coupling is involved (independent of the "direction" I go in the diagram), right? (Sorry in advance for these basic questions..)
 
Correct, whenever you have a coupling of a W with quarks belonging to different generations, you get a suppression (an even larger suppression if the generations are 1,3 or 2,3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K