How Does Weight Affect Speed of a Soap Box Car?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of weight placement on the speed of Soap Box Cars, specifically analyzing the equation a = g sin(θ) - kv²/m. It concludes that while overall weight does not directly affect speed, the distribution of weight can influence performance due to friction differences between wheels. Placing more weight on the back wheels can enhance speed if those wheels have better bearings and rubber, as they can handle the additional load without significant drag. The conversation emphasizes that rolling resistance and friction are more critical factors than aerodynamic drag in determining speed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as acceleration and gravitational potential energy.
  • Familiarity with the equation of motion and its components, particularly in the context of inclined planes.
  • Knowledge of friction types and their effects on motion, specifically in relation to wheel performance.
  • Experience with Soap Box Car design and racing dynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of weight distribution on rolling resistance in Soap Box Cars.
  • Explore advanced physics concepts related to friction and aerodynamics in racing vehicles.
  • Investigate different wheel materials and their impact on performance in Soap Box Cars.
  • Learn about optimizing center of mass for improved speed in gravity-powered vehicles.
USEFUL FOR

Soap Box Car racers, physics students, and hobbyists interested in optimizing vehicle performance through weight distribution and design principles.

Haleybell514
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was wondering about how the placement of weight affects Soap Box Cars. I have been racing them for 5 years now, and I cannot find any information. I was wondering if there was a formula to find the relationship between speed and weight, and how to solve it. For instance, if the car runs faster because weight is in the back, what is the reason for this? Why not the front?

Homework Equations


I found the equation:
a= g sin (θ) - kv2/m
Being in middle school, I am not sure what it means. Please help!

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Overall weight or weight distribution about its center of mass shouldn't matter directly. However, if there is non symmetrical friction between front vs. back wheels on the ground (wether poor bearings, rubber deflection), then these may vary with the weight applied at their specific locations. For example, if you have premium bearings and hard rubber on the back wheels it makes sense to place more weight there because those wheels will be able to handle more without penalty. The worse performing wheels will still drag the speed down somewhat even if they just roll along.

The formula looks to be an acceleration relationship depending on the slope angle (hill). That's not influenced by weight, ideally. Friction and air resistance are your main concerns.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haleybell514
If we assume that the only variable between two cars is weight placement, because we do a wheel swap and a lane change, is there a better formula to use instead of the one I found? If there is a more simple formula, could you explain it to me?
 
Since the ramp levels out, there is a small advantage to having the center of mass as far back as possible, which translates into having the center of mass a bit higher at the start, but ending up at about the same height as a forwards center of mass when the ramp levels out. The result is a greater change in gravitational potential energy.

A heavier cart may experience relatively higher rolling resistance and friction, but relatively lower aerodynamic drag. I suspect the drag isn't as much of a factor as rolling resistance and friction, so lighter may be better, or perhaps there's some ideal weight range.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haleybell514

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
20K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K