How Does Weight Affect Speed of a Soap Box Car?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of weight placement on the speed of Soap Box Cars, exploring the relationship between weight distribution and performance. Participants are investigating whether there is a formula that can quantify this relationship and the underlying reasons for observed behaviors in racing contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how weight distribution affects speed, particularly whether placing weight in the back of the car is advantageous compared to the front. They are also exploring the implications of friction and rolling resistance on performance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights about the influence of weight on speed and raising questions about the adequacy of existing formulas. Some guidance has been offered regarding the factors that may affect performance, such as friction and the center of mass, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive formula or approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of middle school physics knowledge and are seeking clarification on complex concepts such as acceleration, friction, and gravitational potential energy. There is an emphasis on understanding the effects of weight without definitive conclusions about optimal configurations.

Haleybell514
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was wondering about how the placement of weight affects Soap Box Cars. I have been racing them for 5 years now, and I cannot find any information. I was wondering if there was a formula to find the relationship between speed and weight, and how to solve it. For instance, if the car runs faster because weight is in the back, what is the reason for this? Why not the front?

Homework Equations


I found the equation:
a= g sin (θ) - kv2/m
Being in middle school, I am not sure what it means. Please help!

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Overall weight or weight distribution about its center of mass shouldn't matter directly. However, if there is non symmetrical friction between front vs. back wheels on the ground (wether poor bearings, rubber deflection), then these may vary with the weight applied at their specific locations. For example, if you have premium bearings and hard rubber on the back wheels it makes sense to place more weight there because those wheels will be able to handle more without penalty. The worse performing wheels will still drag the speed down somewhat even if they just roll along.

The formula looks to be an acceleration relationship depending on the slope angle (hill). That's not influenced by weight, ideally. Friction and air resistance are your main concerns.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haleybell514
If we assume that the only variable between two cars is weight placement, because we do a wheel swap and a lane change, is there a better formula to use instead of the one I found? If there is a more simple formula, could you explain it to me?
 
Since the ramp levels out, there is a small advantage to having the center of mass as far back as possible, which translates into having the center of mass a bit higher at the start, but ending up at about the same height as a forwards center of mass when the ramp levels out. The result is a greater change in gravitational potential energy.

A heavier cart may experience relatively higher rolling resistance and friction, but relatively lower aerodynamic drag. I suspect the drag isn't as much of a factor as rolling resistance and friction, so lighter may be better, or perhaps there's some ideal weight range.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haleybell514

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
20K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K