How Far Do the Blocks Slide After Spring Release?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks on a frictional surface, connected by a spring that is released, causing the blocks to slide apart. The objective is to determine how far apart the blocks will be after they stop sliding, considering the effects of kinetic friction and the potential energy stored in the spring.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the potential energy of the spring and the work done by friction. There is uncertainty about the definitions of variables such as displacement and how they relate to the spring's compression.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the energy conservation approach, suggesting that the total energy before release must equal the work done by friction. There is ongoing exploration of the equations involved, with participants clarifying the roles of different variables and coefficients.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that additional information, such as the initial compression of the spring and the masses of the blocks, is necessary to proceed further with the calculations.

vande060
Messages
180
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two blocks M1 and M2 rest motionless on
a surface of friction coefficient μk. A powerful
spring of force constant k, compressed by
amount x, is in a cavity inside of them. A
hook holds them together. When the hook is
released, they are flung apart. How far apart
will they be after they stop sliding?

http://s861.photobucket.com/albums/ab174/alkaline262/?action=view&current=book2question2.jpg

Homework Equations



W = 1/2m1v1^2 - 1/2m1v1^2

The Attempt at a Solution



mew = u

okay here we go(maybe)

the potential function for a spring -V = 1/2kx^2
potential function for kinetic friction = ukmgx

not sure about the works above, and if i did the 100% right

work energy theorem 1/2m1v1^2 + 1/2m2v2^2 = 1/2kx^2 - ukmgx

i don't suppose i could just set v1 = v2 = 0 :biggrin: and solve the quadratic for x
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vande060 said:
i don't suppose i could just set v1 = v2 = 0 :biggrin: and solve the quadratic for x

No, because that is a trivial solution.

You are thinking along the right lines, but you don't have to think about the velocities of the blocks at all. You know the P.E. of the spring is the total energy of the system before the hook is released. Then after the blocks come to rest the total energy is 0. What happened to all that energy? (Hint, work done by friction, which is proportional to distance moved ;) )
 
Xerxes1986 said:
No, because that is a trivial solution.

You are thinking along the right lines, but you don't have to think about the velocities of the blocks at all. You know the P.E. of the spring is the total energy of the system before the hook is released. Then after the blocks come to rest the total energy is 0. What happened to all that energy? (Hint, work done by friction, which is proportional to distance moved ;) )

I don't really understand what you are saying here. could you rephrase it please? I am thinking all of that energy is lost during the displacement, where friction is causing loss of energy by heat and noise

so at the risk of reinventing the wheel: kx^2 - ukmgD = 0

d=displacement
i have never really been sure what x represents in the spring function, i don't know if it is the same as displacement
 
Last edited:
Think about it a little harder, you have the general equation right but there are some coefficients and simplifications you can make. (Specifically a factor of 1/2 in front of the PE? and D=x+d, and d is what you want.)
 
Xerxes1986 said:
Think about it a little harder, you have the general equation right but there are some coefficients and simplifications you can make. (Specifically a factor of 1/2 in front of the PE? and D=x+d, and d is what you want.)

okay, i really understand the difference between d and x now. Also, I believe that the coefficient of 1/2 only belongs before the PE of the the spring, correct me if i am wrong but:

1/2kx^2 -ukmg(x+d) = 0

1/2kx^2 -ukmgx - ukmgd = 0

1/2kx^2 -ukmgx = ukmgd

(1/2kx^2 -ukmgx)/ukmg = d

i would have to how much the spring was originally compressed by, along with masses to solve this any further i think
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K