How good are our ears? (Detectable Interstellar signals)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Canada Bob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interstellar Signals
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the sensitivity of radio telescopes in detecting interstellar signals from advanced civilizations. The Arecibo Observatory's historical 1000 kW signal is referenced as a benchmark for understanding signal strength and detection limits. The conversation emphasizes that the effectiveness of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) relies more on the power and sensitivity of radio telescopes, such as the Chinese FAST radio telescope, rather than the auditory capabilities of humans. The planned emission mission "A Beacon in the Galaxy" aims to broadcast Earth's location to potential extraterrestrial life.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radio signal transmission and detection
  • Familiarity with the capabilities of radio telescopes, particularly FAST
  • Knowledge of SETI methodologies and objectives
  • Basic concepts of electromagnetic radiation and its detection
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and capabilities of the FAST radio telescope
  • Explore the implications of the "A Beacon in the Galaxy" emission mission
  • Study the historical context and significance of the Arecibo Observatory's broadcasts
  • Learn about the methodologies used in SETI for signal detection and analysis
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, SETI researchers, and anyone interested in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and the technology behind radio signal detection.

Canada Bob
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Detectable Interstellar signals...
How good are our ears / what can SETI and the like detect ?

If we are listening for a radio signal broadcast by some advanced civilisation in our galaxy how sensitive would our "ears" have to be to detect a signal ? Obviously part of that equation would be how strong and how close the transmitter was, is there a physical limit to the strength of a generated signal that could be broadcast, if so how close would we need to be to detect the signal.

If memory serves me well the loudest signal ever broadcast from Earth was 1000 kW from Arecibo, almost 50 years ago, at what point would that signal become "practically" undetectable ? Can we reasonably deduce that since no one has returned the call that there's no technologically advanced civilsation within 20 light years from Earth ?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Isn't it more a question of how powerful our radio telescopes are, than how good our ears are?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
PeroK said:
Isn't it more a question of how powerful our radio telescopes are, than how good our ears are?
I think the OP was anthropomorphizing the radio telescopes as "ears."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pbuk
Mark44 said:
I think the OP was anthropomorphizing the radio telescopes as "ears."
Given that it's our eyes that detect electromagnetic radiation, perhaps "eyes" would have been more appropriate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Canada Bob said:
Obviously part of that equation would be how strong and how close the transmitter was
Which is why Seti is much more sensitive to radar than radio.
 
PeroK said:
Isn't it more a question of how powerful our radio telescopes are, than how good our ears are?
Powerful ? do you mean sensitive ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
836
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 148 ·
5
Replies
148
Views
12K