How is energy density calculated

Click For Summary
Energy density is calculated using the Planck length and involves understanding Planck density, which is approximately E-5 gm/Planck volume. The discussion highlights the significant discrepancy between the observed cosmological constant (E-29 gm/cm3) and its calculated value, which is a staggering E123 difference. The cosmological constant naturally appears as a curvature constant in Einstein's General Relativity equations, suggesting a simpler explanation for the universe's accelerating expansion. The arguments against the viability of the cosmological constant as an explanation for dark energy are deemed unconvincing. The reference provided offers insights into the density equation, further contributing to the understanding of these concepts.
jimjohnson
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I understand how the Planck length (1.6 x E-33 cm) is calculated from the equation ,Gh/( 2πc3), but how is the Planck density calculated at E-5 gm/Planck volume (E93 to E94 gm/cm3). It is based on "energy jitters".
Also, is there an explanation for the vast difference between the observed cosmological constant (E-29 gm/cm3) and calculated value, a difference of E123? Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
the best discussion I have seen so far of the cosmological constant issue is this essay by a couple of quantum relativists.
Lambda naturally occurs as a curvature constant in the Einstein GR equation.
There is no reason to connect it with the gross QFT miscalculation of the vacuum energy density.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3966
Why all these prejudices against a constant?
Eugenio Bianchi, Carlo Rovelli
(Submitted on 21 Feb 2010)
The expansion of the observed universe appears to be accelerating. A simple explanation of this phenomenon is provided by the non-vanishing of the cosmological constant in the Einstein equations. Arguments are commonly presented to the effect that this simple explanation is not viable or not sufficient, and therefore we are facing the "great mystery" of the "nature of a dark energy". We argue that these arguments are unconvincing, or ill-founded.
9 pages, 4 figures
 
Great reference, who would think that this profound mystery (E120 difference)is "nonsense".
Also, I did find the equation for density in a sepatare reference, Density = c5/(h x G2). Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K